Making Addiction, Making Gender

A Feminist Performativity Analysis of Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines the landmark 2013 judgment of the Australian High Court in Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited. This case focused on the activities of Australian businessman Harry Kakavas, a regular gambler at Melbourne’s Crown casino. Kakavas argued that he was a pathological gambler unconscionably exploited by the casino. Using feminist and queer performativity theory, as well as a science and technology studies (STS) approach to the law, I explore how the court constituted gambling addiction and gender in the case. Via John Law’s notion of ‘collateral realities’, I also examine the way that legal judgments ostensibly dealing with one object can simultaneously materialise other realities, a point with relevance well beyond the present example. I conclude with reflections on the implications of this analysis for law, policy and practice in the study of addiction and gender.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65 - 85
Number of pages21
JournalThe Australian Feminist Law Journal
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

@article{2818624107874c6cbf8b28f0f3404e62,
title = "Making Addiction, Making Gender: A Feminist Performativity Analysis of Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited",
abstract = "This paper examines the landmark 2013 judgment of the Australian High Court in Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited. This case focused on the activities of Australian businessman Harry Kakavas, a regular gambler at Melbourne’s Crown casino. Kakavas argued that he was a pathological gambler unconscionably exploited by the casino. Using feminist and queer performativity theory, as well as a science and technology studies (STS) approach to the law, I explore how the court constituted gambling addiction and gender in the case. Via John Law’s notion of ‘collateral realities’, I also examine the way that legal judgments ostensibly dealing with one object can simultaneously materialise other realities, a point with relevance well beyond the present example. I conclude with reflections on the implications of this analysis for law, policy and practice in the study of addiction and gender.",
author = "Seear, {Kathryn Leigh}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/13200968.2015.1031932",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "65 -- 85",
journal = "The Australian Feminist Law Journal",
issn = "1320-0968",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Making Addiction, Making Gender : A Feminist Performativity Analysis of Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited. / Seear, Kathryn Leigh.

In: The Australian Feminist Law Journal, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2015, p. 65 - 85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making Addiction, Making Gender

T2 - A Feminist Performativity Analysis of Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited

AU - Seear, Kathryn Leigh

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper examines the landmark 2013 judgment of the Australian High Court in Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited. This case focused on the activities of Australian businessman Harry Kakavas, a regular gambler at Melbourne’s Crown casino. Kakavas argued that he was a pathological gambler unconscionably exploited by the casino. Using feminist and queer performativity theory, as well as a science and technology studies (STS) approach to the law, I explore how the court constituted gambling addiction and gender in the case. Via John Law’s notion of ‘collateral realities’, I also examine the way that legal judgments ostensibly dealing with one object can simultaneously materialise other realities, a point with relevance well beyond the present example. I conclude with reflections on the implications of this analysis for law, policy and practice in the study of addiction and gender.

AB - This paper examines the landmark 2013 judgment of the Australian High Court in Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited. This case focused on the activities of Australian businessman Harry Kakavas, a regular gambler at Melbourne’s Crown casino. Kakavas argued that he was a pathological gambler unconscionably exploited by the casino. Using feminist and queer performativity theory, as well as a science and technology studies (STS) approach to the law, I explore how the court constituted gambling addiction and gender in the case. Via John Law’s notion of ‘collateral realities’, I also examine the way that legal judgments ostensibly dealing with one object can simultaneously materialise other realities, a point with relevance well beyond the present example. I conclude with reflections on the implications of this analysis for law, policy and practice in the study of addiction and gender.

U2 - 10.1080/13200968.2015.1031932

DO - 10.1080/13200968.2015.1031932

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 65

EP - 85

JO - The Australian Feminist Law Journal

JF - The Australian Feminist Law Journal

SN - 1320-0968

IS - 1

ER -