TY - JOUR
T1 - Machinations of the British Medical Association
T2 - excluding refugee doctors from Queensland's medical profession, 1937-1942
AU - Wolf, Gabrielle
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - When medical practitioners fled from the Nazi regime in the 1930s, the British Medical Association (hereafter BMA), the representative body of the medical profession in the British Empire, agitated strenuously to prevent 'refugee doctors', as they were described, from practising medicine throughout the Empire. Prominent BMA representatives pursued this agenda in Australia through their appointment to statutory state-based authorities that registered and regulated doctors'. This article investigates how, between 1937 and 1942, they sought to use those bodies' registration and disciplinary powers in Queensland to exclude refugee doctors. They were particularly persistent in this state given its government's resistance to BMA pressure to pass legislation restricting refugee doctors' eligibility for registration. In so doing, the article contributes new perspectives to scholarship that analyses the BMA's effectiveness as a pressure group. This article's exploration of motives for the BMA's animosity towards refugee doctors also builds on histories of the medical profession and of ethnicity within it.
AB - When medical practitioners fled from the Nazi regime in the 1930s, the British Medical Association (hereafter BMA), the representative body of the medical profession in the British Empire, agitated strenuously to prevent 'refugee doctors', as they were described, from practising medicine throughout the Empire. Prominent BMA representatives pursued this agenda in Australia through their appointment to statutory state-based authorities that registered and regulated doctors'. This article investigates how, between 1937 and 1942, they sought to use those bodies' registration and disciplinary powers in Queensland to exclude refugee doctors. They were particularly persistent in this state given its government's resistance to BMA pressure to pass legislation restricting refugee doctors' eligibility for registration. In so doing, the article contributes new perspectives to scholarship that analyses the BMA's effectiveness as a pressure group. This article's exploration of motives for the BMA's animosity towards refugee doctors also builds on histories of the medical profession and of ethnicity within it.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084132384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ajlh/njz020
DO - 10.1093/ajlh/njz020
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85084132384
SN - 0002-9319
VL - 59
SP - 513
EP - 541
JO - American Journal of Legal History
JF - American Journal of Legal History
IS - 4
ER -