Love or hate, depends on who's saying it: How legitimacy of brand rejection alters brand preferences

Miao Hu, Pingping Qiu, Fang Wan, Tyler Stillman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Brand rejection, defined as messages or actions of rejection originating from brands or their representatives and targeted towards consumers, is an increasingly documented phenomenon among companies and brands. The current research examines the perceived legitimacy of brand rejection as a novel and critical moderator for the outcomes of brand rejection. We theorize and show that when brand rejection is deemed to be legitimate, consumers who are rejected show increased preferences towards the focal brand compared to those who did not experience rejection, replicating past research. However, when brand rejection is deemed to be illegitimate, rejected consumers show decreased preferences for the rejecting brand compared to those who did not experience rejection. We further theorize and test that the interactive effects of brand rejection and rejection legitimacy are mediated by perceived brand status. Managerial insights on how legitimacy of brand rejection impacts branding strategies are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-170
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Business Research
Volume90
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2018

Keywords

  • Brand preference
  • Brand rejection
  • Brand status
  • Rejection legitimacy

Cite this

@article{e51aece25ac8443eaae663883639cb94,
title = "Love or hate, depends on who's saying it: How legitimacy of brand rejection alters brand preferences",
abstract = "Brand rejection, defined as messages or actions of rejection originating from brands or their representatives and targeted towards consumers, is an increasingly documented phenomenon among companies and brands. The current research examines the perceived legitimacy of brand rejection as a novel and critical moderator for the outcomes of brand rejection. We theorize and show that when brand rejection is deemed to be legitimate, consumers who are rejected show increased preferences towards the focal brand compared to those who did not experience rejection, replicating past research. However, when brand rejection is deemed to be illegitimate, rejected consumers show decreased preferences for the rejecting brand compared to those who did not experience rejection. We further theorize and test that the interactive effects of brand rejection and rejection legitimacy are mediated by perceived brand status. Managerial insights on how legitimacy of brand rejection impacts branding strategies are discussed.",
keywords = "Brand preference, Brand rejection, Brand status, Rejection legitimacy",
author = "Miao Hu and Pingping Qiu and Fang Wan and Tyler Stillman",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.006",
language = "English",
volume = "90",
pages = "164--170",
journal = "Journal of Business Research",
issn = "0148-2963",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Love or hate, depends on who's saying it : How legitimacy of brand rejection alters brand preferences. / Hu, Miao; Qiu, Pingping; Wan, Fang; Stillman, Tyler.

In: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 90, 01.09.2018, p. 164-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Love or hate, depends on who's saying it

T2 - How legitimacy of brand rejection alters brand preferences

AU - Hu, Miao

AU - Qiu, Pingping

AU - Wan, Fang

AU - Stillman, Tyler

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Brand rejection, defined as messages or actions of rejection originating from brands or their representatives and targeted towards consumers, is an increasingly documented phenomenon among companies and brands. The current research examines the perceived legitimacy of brand rejection as a novel and critical moderator for the outcomes of brand rejection. We theorize and show that when brand rejection is deemed to be legitimate, consumers who are rejected show increased preferences towards the focal brand compared to those who did not experience rejection, replicating past research. However, when brand rejection is deemed to be illegitimate, rejected consumers show decreased preferences for the rejecting brand compared to those who did not experience rejection. We further theorize and test that the interactive effects of brand rejection and rejection legitimacy are mediated by perceived brand status. Managerial insights on how legitimacy of brand rejection impacts branding strategies are discussed.

AB - Brand rejection, defined as messages or actions of rejection originating from brands or their representatives and targeted towards consumers, is an increasingly documented phenomenon among companies and brands. The current research examines the perceived legitimacy of brand rejection as a novel and critical moderator for the outcomes of brand rejection. We theorize and show that when brand rejection is deemed to be legitimate, consumers who are rejected show increased preferences towards the focal brand compared to those who did not experience rejection, replicating past research. However, when brand rejection is deemed to be illegitimate, rejected consumers show decreased preferences for the rejecting brand compared to those who did not experience rejection. We further theorize and test that the interactive effects of brand rejection and rejection legitimacy are mediated by perceived brand status. Managerial insights on how legitimacy of brand rejection impacts branding strategies are discussed.

KW - Brand preference

KW - Brand rejection

KW - Brand status

KW - Rejection legitimacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047091376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.006

M3 - Article

VL - 90

SP - 164

EP - 170

JO - Journal of Business Research

JF - Journal of Business Research

SN - 0148-2963

ER -