Long term outcomes data for the Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand: Is it feasible?

Belinda Jane Gabbe, Heather J Cleland, Dina Michelle Watterson, Rebecca Schrale, Sally McRae, Christine Parker, Susan B Taggart, Dale Wesley Edgar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)


Background: Incorporating routine and standardised collection of long term outcomes following burn into burn registries would improve the capacity to quantify burn burden and evaluate care. Aims: To evaluate methods for collecting the long term functional and quality of life outcomes of burns patients and establish the feasibility of implementing these outcomes into a multi-centre burns registry. Methods: Five Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand (BRANZ) centres participated in this prospective, longitudinal study. Patients admitted to the centres between November 2009 and November 2010 were followed-up at 1, 6, 12 and 24-months after injury using measures of burn specific health, health status, fatigue, itch and return to work. Participants in the study were compared to BRANZ registered patients at the centres over the study timeframe to identify participation bias, predictors of successful follow-up were established using a Generalised Estimating Equation model, and the completion rates by mode of administration were assessed. Results: 463 patients participated in the study, representing 24 of all BRANZ admissions in the same timeframe. Compared to all BRANZ patients in the same timeframe, the median TBSA and hospital length of stay was greater in the study participants. The follow-up rates were 63 at 1-month, 47 at 6-months; 40 at 12-months, and 21 at 24-months after injury, and there was marked variation in follow-up rates between the centres. Increasing age, greater TBSA and opt-in centres were associated with greater follow-up. Centres which predominantly used one mode of administration experienced better follow-up rates. Conclusions: The low participation rates, high loss to follow-up and responder bias observed indicate that greater consideration needs to be given to alternative models for follow-up, including tailoring the follow-up protocol to burn severity or type.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1732 - 1740
Number of pages9
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this