Long-Term Academic Functioning Following Cogmed Working Memory Training for Children Born Extremely Preterm

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Peter J. Anderson, Katherine J. Lee, Gehan Roberts, Megan M. Spencer-Smith, Deanne K. Thompson, Marc L. Seal, Chiara Nosarti, Andrea Grehan, Elisha K. Josev, Susan Gathercole, Lex W. Doyle, Leona Pascoe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of Cogmed Working Memory Training compared with a placebo program in improving academic functioning 24 months post-training in extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight 7-year-olds. Study design: A multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial was conducted across all tertiary neonatal hospitals in the state of Victoria, Australia. Participants were 91 extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight 7-year-old children born in Victoria in 2005. Children were randomly assigned to either the Cogmed or placebo arm and completed the Cogmed or placebo program (20-25 sessions of 35-40 minutes duration) at home over 5-7 weeks. Academic achievement (word reading, spelling, sentence comprehension, and mathematics) was assessed 24 months post-training, as well as at 2 weeks and 12 months post-training, via standardized testing inclusive of working memory, attention, and executive behavior assessments. Data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach with mixed-effects modeling. Results: There was little evidence of any benefits of Cogmed on academic functioning 24 months post-training, as well as on working memory, attention, or executive behavior at any age up to 24 months post-training compared with the placebo program. Conclusions: We currently do not recommend administration of Cogmed for early school-aged children born extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight to improve academic functioning. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12612000124831.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92-97
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Pediatrics
Volume202
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Keywords

  • academic outcomes
  • cognitive training
  • prematurity

Cite this

Anderson, Peter J. ; Lee, Katherine J. ; Roberts, Gehan ; Spencer-Smith, Megan M. ; Thompson, Deanne K. ; Seal, Marc L. ; Nosarti, Chiara ; Grehan, Andrea ; Josev, Elisha K. ; Gathercole, Susan ; Doyle, Lex W. ; Pascoe, Leona. / Long-Term Academic Functioning Following Cogmed Working Memory Training for Children Born Extremely Preterm : A Randomized Controlled Trial. In: Journal of Pediatrics. 2018 ; Vol. 202. pp. 92-97.
@article{5f60dcbaa59e480685e334a17e0172d8,
title = "Long-Term Academic Functioning Following Cogmed Working Memory Training for Children Born Extremely Preterm: A Randomized Controlled Trial",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the effectiveness of Cogmed Working Memory Training compared with a placebo program in improving academic functioning 24 months post-training in extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight 7-year-olds. Study design: A multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial was conducted across all tertiary neonatal hospitals in the state of Victoria, Australia. Participants were 91 extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight 7-year-old children born in Victoria in 2005. Children were randomly assigned to either the Cogmed or placebo arm and completed the Cogmed or placebo program (20-25 sessions of 35-40 minutes duration) at home over 5-7 weeks. Academic achievement (word reading, spelling, sentence comprehension, and mathematics) was assessed 24 months post-training, as well as at 2 weeks and 12 months post-training, via standardized testing inclusive of working memory, attention, and executive behavior assessments. Data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach with mixed-effects modeling. Results: There was little evidence of any benefits of Cogmed on academic functioning 24 months post-training, as well as on working memory, attention, or executive behavior at any age up to 24 months post-training compared with the placebo program. Conclusions: We currently do not recommend administration of Cogmed for early school-aged children born extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight to improve academic functioning. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12612000124831.",
keywords = "academic outcomes, cognitive training, prematurity",
author = "Anderson, {Peter J.} and Lee, {Katherine J.} and Gehan Roberts and Spencer-Smith, {Megan M.} and Thompson, {Deanne K.} and Seal, {Marc L.} and Chiara Nosarti and Andrea Grehan and Josev, {Elisha K.} and Susan Gathercole and Doyle, {Lex W.} and Leona Pascoe",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.003",
language = "English",
volume = "202",
pages = "92--97",
journal = "Journal of Pediatrics",
issn = "0022-3476",
publisher = "Mosby International",

}

Long-Term Academic Functioning Following Cogmed Working Memory Training for Children Born Extremely Preterm : A Randomized Controlled Trial. / Anderson, Peter J.; Lee, Katherine J.; Roberts, Gehan; Spencer-Smith, Megan M.; Thompson, Deanne K.; Seal, Marc L.; Nosarti, Chiara; Grehan, Andrea; Josev, Elisha K.; Gathercole, Susan; Doyle, Lex W.; Pascoe, Leona.

In: Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 202, 01.11.2018, p. 92-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-Term Academic Functioning Following Cogmed Working Memory Training for Children Born Extremely Preterm

T2 - A Randomized Controlled Trial

AU - Anderson, Peter J.

AU - Lee, Katherine J.

AU - Roberts, Gehan

AU - Spencer-Smith, Megan M.

AU - Thompson, Deanne K.

AU - Seal, Marc L.

AU - Nosarti, Chiara

AU - Grehan, Andrea

AU - Josev, Elisha K.

AU - Gathercole, Susan

AU - Doyle, Lex W.

AU - Pascoe, Leona

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Objective: To assess the effectiveness of Cogmed Working Memory Training compared with a placebo program in improving academic functioning 24 months post-training in extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight 7-year-olds. Study design: A multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial was conducted across all tertiary neonatal hospitals in the state of Victoria, Australia. Participants were 91 extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight 7-year-old children born in Victoria in 2005. Children were randomly assigned to either the Cogmed or placebo arm and completed the Cogmed or placebo program (20-25 sessions of 35-40 minutes duration) at home over 5-7 weeks. Academic achievement (word reading, spelling, sentence comprehension, and mathematics) was assessed 24 months post-training, as well as at 2 weeks and 12 months post-training, via standardized testing inclusive of working memory, attention, and executive behavior assessments. Data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach with mixed-effects modeling. Results: There was little evidence of any benefits of Cogmed on academic functioning 24 months post-training, as well as on working memory, attention, or executive behavior at any age up to 24 months post-training compared with the placebo program. Conclusions: We currently do not recommend administration of Cogmed for early school-aged children born extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight to improve academic functioning. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12612000124831.

AB - Objective: To assess the effectiveness of Cogmed Working Memory Training compared with a placebo program in improving academic functioning 24 months post-training in extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight 7-year-olds. Study design: A multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial was conducted across all tertiary neonatal hospitals in the state of Victoria, Australia. Participants were 91 extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight 7-year-old children born in Victoria in 2005. Children were randomly assigned to either the Cogmed or placebo arm and completed the Cogmed or placebo program (20-25 sessions of 35-40 minutes duration) at home over 5-7 weeks. Academic achievement (word reading, spelling, sentence comprehension, and mathematics) was assessed 24 months post-training, as well as at 2 weeks and 12 months post-training, via standardized testing inclusive of working memory, attention, and executive behavior assessments. Data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach with mixed-effects modeling. Results: There was little evidence of any benefits of Cogmed on academic functioning 24 months post-training, as well as on working memory, attention, or executive behavior at any age up to 24 months post-training compared with the placebo program. Conclusions: We currently do not recommend administration of Cogmed for early school-aged children born extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight to improve academic functioning. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12612000124831.

KW - academic outcomes

KW - cognitive training

KW - prematurity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054077100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.003

M3 - Article

VL - 202

SP - 92

EP - 97

JO - Journal of Pediatrics

JF - Journal of Pediatrics

SN - 0022-3476

ER -