Long-Term Academic Functioning Following Cogmed Working Memory Training for Children Born Extremely Preterm: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Peter J. Anderson, Katherine J. Lee, Gehan Roberts, Megan M. Spencer-Smith, Deanne K. Thompson, Marc L. Seal, Chiara Nosarti, Andrea Grehan, Elisha K. Josev, Susan Gathercole, Lex W. Doyle, Leona Pascoe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of Cogmed Working Memory Training compared with a placebo program in improving academic functioning 24 months post-training in extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight 7-year-olds. Study design: A multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial was conducted across all tertiary neonatal hospitals in the state of Victoria, Australia. Participants were 91 extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight 7-year-old children born in Victoria in 2005. Children were randomly assigned to either the Cogmed or placebo arm and completed the Cogmed or placebo program (20-25 sessions of 35-40 minutes duration) at home over 5-7 weeks. Academic achievement (word reading, spelling, sentence comprehension, and mathematics) was assessed 24 months post-training, as well as at 2 weeks and 12 months post-training, via standardized testing inclusive of working memory, attention, and executive behavior assessments. Data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach with mixed-effects modeling. Results: There was little evidence of any benefits of Cogmed on academic functioning 24 months post-training, as well as on working memory, attention, or executive behavior at any age up to 24 months post-training compared with the placebo program. Conclusions: We currently do not recommend administration of Cogmed for early school-aged children born extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight to improve academic functioning. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12612000124831.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92-97
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Pediatrics
Volume202
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Keywords

  • academic outcomes
  • cognitive training
  • prematurity

Cite this