Projects per year
Abstract
While it is important for the evidence supporting practice guidelines to be current, that is often not the case. The advent of living systematic reviews has made the concept of “living guidelines” realistic, with the promise to provide timely, up-to-date and high-quality guidance to target users. We define living guidelines as an optimization of the guideline development process to allow updating individual recommendations as soon as new relevant evidence becomes available. A major implication of that definition is that the unit of update is the individual recommendation and not the whole guideline. We then discuss when living guidelines are appropriate, the workflows required to support them, the collaboration between living systematic reviews and living guideline teams, the thresholds for changing recommendations, and potential approaches to publication and dissemination. The success and sustainability of the concept of living guideline will depend on those of its major pillar, the living systematic review. We conclude that guideline developers should both experiment with and research the process of living guidelines.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 47-53 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
Volume | 91 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2017 |
Keywords
- Living guidelines
- Living systematic review
- Prioritizing recommendations
- Updating guidelines
- Updating systematic reviews
Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Evidence Innovation: transforming the efficiency of systematic review
Elliott, J. (Primary Chief Investigator (PCI)), Green, S. (Chief Investigator (CI)), Thomas, J. R. V. (Chief Investigator (CI)), Tovey, D. I. (Chief Investigator (CI)), Glasziou, P. P. (Chief Investigator (CI)) & Clarke, M. (Chief Investigator (CI))
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (Australia), Cochrane (United Kingdom)
1/01/16 → 31/12/18
Project: Research