Abstract
The extraordinary litigation in 1944 that enveloped Sir William Dobell, one of Australia's best known artists, ostensibly addressed whether his painting of a fellow artist, Joshua Smith, constituted a portrait or a caricature and thus whether it qualified for the prestigious Archibald Prize. However, there was much more to the litigation than a clash between modernism and traditionalism in portraiture. It constituted an archetypal example of the ways in which litigation can have counter-therapeutic effects for all who are party to it unless suitable prophylactic measures are taken or at least strategies are exercised to reduce its toxicity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 161-171 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Psychiatry, Psychology and Law |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 Mar 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- art
- counter-therapeutic effects
- litigation
- psychiatric harm
- therapeutic jurisprudence
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver