Abstract
The extraordinary litigation in 1944 that enveloped Sir William Dobell, one of Australia's best known artists, ostensibly addressed whether his painting of a fellow artist, Joshua Smith, constituted a portrait or a caricature and thus whether it qualified for the prestigious Archibald Prize. However, there was much more to the litigation than a clash between modernism and traditionalism in portraiture. It constituted an archetypal example of the ways in which litigation can have counter-therapeutic effects for all who are party to it unless suitable prophylactic measures are taken or at least strategies are exercised to reduce its toxicity.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 161-171 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Psychiatry, Psychology & Law |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 4 Mar 2015 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- art
- counter-therapeutic effects
- litigation
- psychiatric harm
- therapeutic jurisprudence