TY - JOUR
T1 - Lifetime Physical Loading and Magnetic Resonance-Derived Intervertebral Disc Health in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain
T2 - A Cross-Sectional Study
AU - Samanna, Claire L.
AU - Neason, Christopher
AU - Tagliaferri, Scott D.
AU - Mitchell, Ulrike H.
AU - Caldwell, Michelle
AU - Imran, Ali
AU - Nez, Hana Rae
AU - Belavý, Daniel L.
AU - Miller, Clint T.
AU - Scott, David
AU - Mundell, Niamh L.
AU - Buntine, Paul
A2 - Owen, Patrick J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). JOR Spine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society.
PY - 2026/6
Y1 - 2026/6
N2 - Background: The intervertebral disc (IVD) is a mechanosensitive structure influenced by physical loading (physical activity/sport/exercise); however, the optimal type and parameters of physical loading for IVD health remain unclear. The Bone Physical Activity Questionnaire is validated to predict bone mineral density from lifetime exposure to physical loading; therefore, we explored the association between lifetime physical loading and IVD health. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 40 individuals with chronic low back pain. Outcomes were magnetic resonance imaging-derived IVD measures reported as both averages and across individual spinal levels T11/T12–L5/S1, including T2 (ms, measure of hydration), height-to-vertebral-body ratio, nucleus-to-annulus signal intensity ratio, volume (cm3), and Pfirrmann grade (0–5 points). Multiple linear regression examined lifetime physical loading and IVD health while controlling for significant covariates (age, body mass index, current and past occupational sitting, and physical labour). Results: Lifetime bone-related physical loading was not associated with IVD health across average spine values, except nucleus-to-annulus signal intensity ratio, which was negatively associated (β [95% CI]: −0.00 [−0.01, −0.00], p = 0.030). At L5/S1, IVD T2 (−0.30 [−0.56, −0.05], p = 0.022) and nucleus-to-annulus signal intensity (−0.02 [−0.03, −0.01], p = 0.007) were negatively associated, and Pfirrmann grade (0.02 [0.01, 0.03], p = 0.006) was positively associated with physical loading. Conclusions: Physical activity loading necessary for improved IVD health appears to differ from loading previously reported for optimal bone health. Specifically, lifetime activity levels considered beneficial for bone were associated with less favourable L5/S1 IVD characteristics, highlighting distinct loading requirements across these tissues. Future studies could develop a questionnaire that captures optimal physical loading for IVD health, such as moderate physical loading.
AB - Background: The intervertebral disc (IVD) is a mechanosensitive structure influenced by physical loading (physical activity/sport/exercise); however, the optimal type and parameters of physical loading for IVD health remain unclear. The Bone Physical Activity Questionnaire is validated to predict bone mineral density from lifetime exposure to physical loading; therefore, we explored the association between lifetime physical loading and IVD health. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 40 individuals with chronic low back pain. Outcomes were magnetic resonance imaging-derived IVD measures reported as both averages and across individual spinal levels T11/T12–L5/S1, including T2 (ms, measure of hydration), height-to-vertebral-body ratio, nucleus-to-annulus signal intensity ratio, volume (cm3), and Pfirrmann grade (0–5 points). Multiple linear regression examined lifetime physical loading and IVD health while controlling for significant covariates (age, body mass index, current and past occupational sitting, and physical labour). Results: Lifetime bone-related physical loading was not associated with IVD health across average spine values, except nucleus-to-annulus signal intensity ratio, which was negatively associated (β [95% CI]: −0.00 [−0.01, −0.00], p = 0.030). At L5/S1, IVD T2 (−0.30 [−0.56, −0.05], p = 0.022) and nucleus-to-annulus signal intensity (−0.02 [−0.03, −0.01], p = 0.007) were negatively associated, and Pfirrmann grade (0.02 [0.01, 0.03], p = 0.006) was positively associated with physical loading. Conclusions: Physical activity loading necessary for improved IVD health appears to differ from loading previously reported for optimal bone health. Specifically, lifetime activity levels considered beneficial for bone were associated with less favourable L5/S1 IVD characteristics, highlighting distinct loading requirements across these tissues. Future studies could develop a questionnaire that captures optimal physical loading for IVD health, such as moderate physical loading.
KW - back pain
KW - lifespan exercise
KW - lumbar imaging
KW - spinal disc
KW - spine
KW - sports
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105039088549
U2 - 10.1002/jsp2.70186
DO - 10.1002/jsp2.70186
M3 - Article
C2 - 42146264
AN - SCOPUS:105039088549
SN - 2572-1143
VL - 9
JO - JOR Spine
JF - JOR Spine
IS - 2
M1 - e70186
ER -