Abstract
In this chapter, I examine the uses to which the concept of the normal is put in debates on liberal eugenics and human enhancement. I discuss three particular approaches to human nature and the normal: Jurgen Habermas s emphasis on human nature as a normative concept that grounds the moral distinction between therapy and enhancement; the use of the normal species function model of normality by Allen Buchanan and his co-authors; and finally, John Harris s rejection of normality and consequent embrace of enhancement technologies. Following this, I draw on the work of Georges Canguilhem to outline a conception of the normal that would avoid the worries that hound Habermas s normative account of human nature, while still allowing for a distinction between therapy and enhancement.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Medicine and Society, New Perspectives in Continental Philosophy |
| Editors | Darian Meacham |
| Place of Publication | Dordrecht The Netherlands |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Pages | 179 - 194 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9789401798693 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver