Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma

  • Lotfi Benboubker
  • , Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos
  • , Angela Dispenzieri
  • , John Catalano
  • , Andrew R Belch
  • , Michele M Cavo
  • , Antonello I Pinto
  • , Katja Christina Weisel
  • , Heinz Ludwig
  • , Nizar Jacques Bahlis
  • , Anne Banos
  • , Mourad Tiab
  • , Michel Delforge
  • , Jamie D Cavenagh
  • , Catarina Geraldes
  • , Jejung Lee
  • , Christine Chen
  • , Albert Oriol
  • , Javier De La Rubia
  • , Lugui Qiu
  • Darrell J White, Daniel Binder, Kenneth Carl Anderson, Jean Paul Fermand, Philippe Moreau, Michel Attal, Robert D Knight, Guang Chen, Jason Van Oostendorp, Christian Jacques, Annette L Ervin-Haynes, Herve Avet-Loiseau, Cyrille Hulin, Thierry Facon

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: The combination melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (MPT) is considered a standard therapy for patients with myeloma who are ineligible for stem-cell transplantation. However, emerging data on the use of lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone warrant a prospective comparison of the two approaches. Methods: We randomly assigned 1623 patients to lenalidomide and dexamethasone in 28-day cycles until disease progression (535 patients), to the same combination for 72 weeks (18 cycles; 541 patients), or to MPT for 72 weeks (547 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival with continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus MPT. Results: The median progression-free survival was 25.5 months with continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone, 20.7 months with 18 cycles of lenalidomide-dexamethasone, and 21.2 months with MPT (hazard ratio for the risk of progression or death, 0.72 for continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs. MPT and 0.70 for continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs. 18 cycles of lenalidomide-dexamethasone; P
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)906 - 917
    Number of pages12
    JournalThe New England Journal of Medicine
    Volume371
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Cite this