Legal aid and access to legal representation

Redefining the right to a fair trial

Asher Leigh Gevaux Flynn, Jacqueline Hodgson, Judith McCulloch, Bronwyn Glynis Naylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The unmet demand for legal aid generally and for criminal law matters in particular, has grown in tandem with the expansion of crime control and increased restrictions on funding for publicly funded welfare and support services. This article examines the connection between legal aid, legal representation and the right to a fair trial. It presents an in-depth case study of Victorian case law and policy development to illuminate dilemmas in the prioritised allocation of legal aid resources in serious criminal trials. It
then compares the Victorian courts’ approach to a fair trial with the tenets of current European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence regarding the scope and timing of an accused person’s right to access a lawyer. The comparison underlines the narrow definition of fair trial under Victorian common law, relative to Europe, where a fair trial is interpreted more broadly to include the right to legal representation during police and pre-trial investigations. The article questions whether international developments in access to legal aid for criminal trials and the extension of legal aid and representation to pre-trial procedures, most notably through the Salduz case (heard in the European Court
of Human Rights), may inspire change in Victoria.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-239
Number of pages33
JournalMelbourne University Law Review
Volume40
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Legal aid
  • Legal representation
  • Victorian case law
  • Fair trial
  • Human Rights

Cite this

@article{91d9b0601086456ca00da7b38d4782e9,
title = "Legal aid and access to legal representation: Redefining the right to a fair trial",
abstract = "The unmet demand for legal aid generally and for criminal law matters in particular, has grown in tandem with the expansion of crime control and increased restrictions on funding for publicly funded welfare and support services. This article examines the connection between legal aid, legal representation and the right to a fair trial. It presents an in-depth case study of Victorian case law and policy development to illuminate dilemmas in the prioritised allocation of legal aid resources in serious criminal trials. Itthen compares the Victorian courts’ approach to a fair trial with the tenets of current European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence regarding the scope and timing of an accused person’s right to access a lawyer. The comparison underlines the narrow definition of fair trial under Victorian common law, relative to Europe, where a fair trial is interpreted more broadly to include the right to legal representation during police and pre-trial investigations. The article questions whether international developments in access to legal aid for criminal trials and the extension of legal aid and representation to pre-trial procedures, most notably through the Salduz case (heard in the European Courtof Human Rights), may inspire change in Victoria.",
keywords = "Legal aid, Legal representation, Victorian case law, Fair trial, Human Rights",
author = "Flynn, {Asher Leigh Gevaux} and Jacqueline Hodgson and Judith McCulloch and Naylor, {Bronwyn Glynis}",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "207--239",
journal = "Melbourne University Law Review",
issn = "0025-8938",
publisher = "Melbourne University, Law Review Association",
number = "1",

}

Legal aid and access to legal representation : Redefining the right to a fair trial. / Flynn, Asher Leigh Gevaux; Hodgson, Jacqueline ; McCulloch, Judith; Naylor, Bronwyn Glynis.

In: Melbourne University Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2016, p. 207-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legal aid and access to legal representation

T2 - Redefining the right to a fair trial

AU - Flynn, Asher Leigh Gevaux

AU - Hodgson, Jacqueline

AU - McCulloch, Judith

AU - Naylor, Bronwyn Glynis

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The unmet demand for legal aid generally and for criminal law matters in particular, has grown in tandem with the expansion of crime control and increased restrictions on funding for publicly funded welfare and support services. This article examines the connection between legal aid, legal representation and the right to a fair trial. It presents an in-depth case study of Victorian case law and policy development to illuminate dilemmas in the prioritised allocation of legal aid resources in serious criminal trials. Itthen compares the Victorian courts’ approach to a fair trial with the tenets of current European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence regarding the scope and timing of an accused person’s right to access a lawyer. The comparison underlines the narrow definition of fair trial under Victorian common law, relative to Europe, where a fair trial is interpreted more broadly to include the right to legal representation during police and pre-trial investigations. The article questions whether international developments in access to legal aid for criminal trials and the extension of legal aid and representation to pre-trial procedures, most notably through the Salduz case (heard in the European Courtof Human Rights), may inspire change in Victoria.

AB - The unmet demand for legal aid generally and for criminal law matters in particular, has grown in tandem with the expansion of crime control and increased restrictions on funding for publicly funded welfare and support services. This article examines the connection between legal aid, legal representation and the right to a fair trial. It presents an in-depth case study of Victorian case law and policy development to illuminate dilemmas in the prioritised allocation of legal aid resources in serious criminal trials. Itthen compares the Victorian courts’ approach to a fair trial with the tenets of current European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence regarding the scope and timing of an accused person’s right to access a lawyer. The comparison underlines the narrow definition of fair trial under Victorian common law, relative to Europe, where a fair trial is interpreted more broadly to include the right to legal representation during police and pre-trial investigations. The article questions whether international developments in access to legal aid for criminal trials and the extension of legal aid and representation to pre-trial procedures, most notably through the Salduz case (heard in the European Courtof Human Rights), may inspire change in Victoria.

KW - Legal aid

KW - Legal representation

KW - Victorian case law

KW - Fair trial

KW - Human Rights

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 207

EP - 239

JO - Melbourne University Law Review

JF - Melbourne University Law Review

SN - 0025-8938

IS - 1

ER -