Leaving the grid

an ambition or a real choice?

Rajab Khalilpour, Anthony Vassallo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The recent rapid decline in PV prices has brought grid parity, or near grid parity for PV in many countries. This, together with an expectation of a similar reduction for battery prices has prompted a new wave of social and academic discussions about the possibility of installing PV-battery systems and "leaving the grid" or "living off-grid". This, if uncontrolled, has been termed the "death spiral" for utility companies.We have developed a decision support tool for rigorous assessment of the feasibility of leaving the grid. Numerous sensitivity analyses are carried out over critical parameters such as technology costs, system size, consumer load, and feed-in-tariff. The results show that, in most cases, leaving-the-grid is not the best economic option and it might be more beneficial to keep the connection with the grid, but minimize the electricity purchased by installation of an optimized size of PV-battery systems.The policy implication of this study is that, from an economic perspective, widespread disconnection might not be a realistic projection of the future. Rather, a notable reduction of energy demand per connection point is a more realistic option as PV-battery system prices decline further. Therefore, policies could be devised to help electricity network operators develop other sources of revenue rather than increasing energy prices, which have been assumed to be the key driver of the death spiral.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-221
Number of pages15
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume82
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Battery energy storage
  • Death spiral
  • Distributed generation
  • Grid defection
  • Leaving the grid
  • Living off-grid
  • Solar photovoltaic

Cite this

Khalilpour, Rajab ; Vassallo, Anthony. / Leaving the grid : an ambition or a real choice?. In: Energy Policy. 2015 ; Vol. 82, No. 1. pp. 207-221.
@article{d8b2be4f61b2453c874821324ad21bbc,
title = "Leaving the grid: an ambition or a real choice?",
abstract = "The recent rapid decline in PV prices has brought grid parity, or near grid parity for PV in many countries. This, together with an expectation of a similar reduction for battery prices has prompted a new wave of social and academic discussions about the possibility of installing PV-battery systems and {"}leaving the grid{"} or {"}living off-grid{"}. This, if uncontrolled, has been termed the {"}death spiral{"} for utility companies.We have developed a decision support tool for rigorous assessment of the feasibility of leaving the grid. Numerous sensitivity analyses are carried out over critical parameters such as technology costs, system size, consumer load, and feed-in-tariff. The results show that, in most cases, leaving-the-grid is not the best economic option and it might be more beneficial to keep the connection with the grid, but minimize the electricity purchased by installation of an optimized size of PV-battery systems.The policy implication of this study is that, from an economic perspective, widespread disconnection might not be a realistic projection of the future. Rather, a notable reduction of energy demand per connection point is a more realistic option as PV-battery system prices decline further. Therefore, policies could be devised to help electricity network operators develop other sources of revenue rather than increasing energy prices, which have been assumed to be the key driver of the death spiral.",
keywords = "Battery energy storage, Death spiral, Distributed generation, Grid defection, Leaving the grid, Living off-grid, Solar photovoltaic",
author = "Rajab Khalilpour and Anthony Vassallo",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2015.03.005",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "207--221",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Leaving the grid : an ambition or a real choice? / Khalilpour, Rajab; Vassallo, Anthony.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 82, No. 1, 2015, p. 207-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Leaving the grid

T2 - an ambition or a real choice?

AU - Khalilpour, Rajab

AU - Vassallo, Anthony

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The recent rapid decline in PV prices has brought grid parity, or near grid parity for PV in many countries. This, together with an expectation of a similar reduction for battery prices has prompted a new wave of social and academic discussions about the possibility of installing PV-battery systems and "leaving the grid" or "living off-grid". This, if uncontrolled, has been termed the "death spiral" for utility companies.We have developed a decision support tool for rigorous assessment of the feasibility of leaving the grid. Numerous sensitivity analyses are carried out over critical parameters such as technology costs, system size, consumer load, and feed-in-tariff. The results show that, in most cases, leaving-the-grid is not the best economic option and it might be more beneficial to keep the connection with the grid, but minimize the electricity purchased by installation of an optimized size of PV-battery systems.The policy implication of this study is that, from an economic perspective, widespread disconnection might not be a realistic projection of the future. Rather, a notable reduction of energy demand per connection point is a more realistic option as PV-battery system prices decline further. Therefore, policies could be devised to help electricity network operators develop other sources of revenue rather than increasing energy prices, which have been assumed to be the key driver of the death spiral.

AB - The recent rapid decline in PV prices has brought grid parity, or near grid parity for PV in many countries. This, together with an expectation of a similar reduction for battery prices has prompted a new wave of social and academic discussions about the possibility of installing PV-battery systems and "leaving the grid" or "living off-grid". This, if uncontrolled, has been termed the "death spiral" for utility companies.We have developed a decision support tool for rigorous assessment of the feasibility of leaving the grid. Numerous sensitivity analyses are carried out over critical parameters such as technology costs, system size, consumer load, and feed-in-tariff. The results show that, in most cases, leaving-the-grid is not the best economic option and it might be more beneficial to keep the connection with the grid, but minimize the electricity purchased by installation of an optimized size of PV-battery systems.The policy implication of this study is that, from an economic perspective, widespread disconnection might not be a realistic projection of the future. Rather, a notable reduction of energy demand per connection point is a more realistic option as PV-battery system prices decline further. Therefore, policies could be devised to help electricity network operators develop other sources of revenue rather than increasing energy prices, which have been assumed to be the key driver of the death spiral.

KW - Battery energy storage

KW - Death spiral

KW - Distributed generation

KW - Grid defection

KW - Leaving the grid

KW - Living off-grid

KW - Solar photovoltaic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84932622887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.03.005

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.03.005

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 207

EP - 221

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

IS - 1

ER -