Abstract
In interaction, participants have access to the existing “epistemic domains” outside the immediate context
of their interactions (Stivers & Rossano 2010) that enables them to align with a speaker’s epistemic status
(Heritage 2012). This paper describes the resources that both teacher and students draw on from the
“epistemic domain” of foreign language learning to build their understanding and participation in an
Italian as a foreign language lesson. Students have access to this domain through exposure and the
experience of learning the language. It includes knowledge about how language practice is achieved in
the classroom, how transitions in the lesson are organized as well as how understanding of a foreign
language is accrued over time. As language is central to meaning making for language learning,
discussion will focus on how both languages, English and Italian, are deployed as part of stance-taking.
The 50 minute class to be analysed was composed of about 26 twelve year-old students in their first year
of high school in an Australian public school. The students had been learning Italian as a foreign language
for nine months approximating 130 hours of instruction. The lesson focused on language as content in
which the teacher immersed students in Italian as much as possible. This pedagogical stance provided an
excellent opportunity to analyse the “division of labour” (Cromdal 2004) with respect to the ways in
which the languages were alternated.
While findings in this study are consonant with previous findings about when and why language
switching occurs, particularly interesting are two findings. The first is the ways in which language
switching is used to ascribe “expected” knowledge states to students as a class and to students as
individuals. The second is how students avail themselves of opportunities present in the context to build
understanding of Italian as the language of instruction so that they can successfully answer teacher
questions or follow instructions without having to admit that they “don’t know” what is being asked of
them.
I conclude by arguing that analysing epistemic stance alignment through the ways in which the languages
are distributed in sequences provides a particularly powerful lens through which to view language
learning and comprehension as it unfolds in the moment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages | 164-164 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2015 |
Event | 14th International Pragmatics Conference - Antwerp, Belgium Duration: 26 Jul 2015 → 31 Jul 2015 http://ipra.ua.ac.be/download.aspx?c=.CONFERENCE14&n=1476&ct=1476&e=15317 |
Conference
Conference | 14th International Pragmatics Conference |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Belgium |
Period | 26/07/15 → 31/07/15 |
Internet address |