Abstract
Introduction Interventional ICU trials have followed up patients
for variable duration. However, the optimal duration of follow-up
for the determination of mortality endpoint in such trials is
uncertain. We aimed to determine the most logical and practical
mortality end-point in clinical trials of critically ill patients.
Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of
prospectively collected data involving 369 patients with one of
the three specific diagnoses (i) Sepsis (ii) Community acquired
pneumonia (iii) Non operative trauma admitted to the Royal
Perth Hospital ICU, a large teaching hospital in Western
Australia (WA cohort). Their in-hospital and post discharge
survival outcome was assessed by linkage to the WA Death
Registry. A validation cohort involving 4609 patients admitted
during same time period with identical diagnoses from 55 ICUs
across Australia (CORE cohort) was used to compare the
patient characteristics and in-hospital survival to look at the
Australia-wide applicability of the long term survival data from
the WA cohort.
Results The long term outcome data of the WA cohort indicate
that mortality reached a plateau at 90 days after ICU admission
particularly for sepsis and pneumonia. Mortality after hospital
discharge before 90 days was not uncommon in these two
groups. Severity of acute illness as measured by the total
number of organ failures or acute physiology score was the main
predictor of 90-day mortality. The adjusted in-hospital survival
for the WA cohort was not significantly different from that of the
CORE cohort in all three diagnostic groups; sepsis (P = 0.19),
community acquired pneumonia (P = 0.86), non-operative
trauma (P = 0.47).
Conclusions A minimum of 90 days follow-up is necessary to
fully capture the mortality effect of sepsis and community
acquired pneumonia. A shorter period of follow-up time may be
sufficient for non-operative trauma.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | R128 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Critical Care |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver