Land rights and the operation of public law: Yunupingu v Commonwealth

Kate Galloway; Melissa Castan

Land rights and the operation of public law: Yunupingu v Commonwealth

Law Academic

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment / Debate › Other › peer-review

Abstract

This article addresses aspects of the Commonwealth’s argument before the Full Federal Court in Yunupingu v Commonwealth (2023) to identify the incoherence of the State’s position and make a normative argument about the need for the State, after over 50 years of litigation, to adopt a more principled strategy in its engagements with First Peoples concerning land.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	175-181
Number of pages	7
Journal	Public Law Review
Volume	34
Issue number	3
Publication status	Published - 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Cite this

@article{4c3ed6407b7b444da356707d69465812,

title = "Land rights and the operation of public law: Yunupingu v Commonwealth",

abstract = "This article addresses aspects of the Commonwealth{\textquoteright}s argument before the Full Federal Court in Yunupingu v Commonwealth (2023) to identify the incoherence of the State{\textquoteright}s position and make a normative argument about the need for the State, after over 50 years of litigation, to adopt a more principled strategy in its engagements with First Peoples concerning land.",

author = "Kate Galloway and Melissa Castan",

year = "2023",

language = "English",

volume = "34",

pages = "175--181",

journal = "Public Law Review",

issn = "1034-3024",

publisher = "Thomson Reuters",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Land rights and the operation of public law

T2 - Yunupingu v Commonwealth

AU - Galloway, Kate

AU - Castan, Melissa

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - This article addresses aspects of the Commonwealth’s argument before the Full Federal Court in Yunupingu v Commonwealth (2023) to identify the incoherence of the State’s position and make a normative argument about the need for the State, after over 50 years of litigation, to adopt a more principled strategy in its engagements with First Peoples concerning land.

AB - This article addresses aspects of the Commonwealth’s argument before the Full Federal Court in Yunupingu v Commonwealth (2023) to identify the incoherence of the State’s position and make a normative argument about the need for the State, after over 50 years of litigation, to adopt a more principled strategy in its engagements with First Peoples concerning land.

M3 - Comment / Debate

SN - 1034-3024

VL - 34

SP - 175

EP - 181

JO - Public Law Review

JF - Public Law Review

IS - 3

ER -