Kidney function and population-based outcomes of initiating oral atenolol versus metoprolol tartrate in older adults

Jamie L. Fleet, Matthew A. Weir, Eric McArthur, Sundus Ozair, Philip J. Devereaux, Matthew A. Roberts, Arsh K. Jain, Amit X. Garg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Atenolol and metoprolol tartrate are commonly prescribed β-blockers. Atenolol elimination depends on kidney function, whereas metoprolol tartrate does not. We hypothesized that compared to metoprolol tartrate, initiating oral atenolol treatment would be associated with more adverse events in older adults, with the association most pronounced in patients with lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs).

Study Design Population-based matched retrospective cohort study.

Setting & Participants Older adults (mean age, 75 years) in Ontario, Canada, prescribed oral atenolol versus metoprolol tartrate from April 2002 through December 2011. The 2 groups were well matched (n = 75,257 in each group), with no difference in 31 measured baseline characteristics. Patients with end-stage renal disease were ineligible, and 4.6% of patients had chronic kidney disease (median eGFR, 38 mL/min/1.73 m2 assessed through a database algorithm).

Predictors β-Blocker type and eGFR.

Outcomes A composite outcome of hospitalization with bradycardia or hypotension and all-cause mortality were assessed in 90-day follow-up.

Results Compared to metoprolol tartrate, initiating atenolol treatment was not associated with higher risk of hospitalization with bradycardia or hypotension (incidence, 0.71% vs 0.79%; relative risk, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.80-1.01). Atenolol treatment initiation was associated with lower 90-day risk of mortality than metoprolol tartrate (incidence, 0.97% vs 1.44%; relative risk, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.61-0.74). Lower eGFR did not modify either association (P for interaction = 0.5 and 0.6, respectively).

Limitations Heart rate and blood pressure were not available in our data sources, and effects ascertained from observational studies are subject to residual confounding.

Conclusions Contrary to our expectation, we found that atenolol versus metoprolol tartrate was associated with lower 90-day risk of mortality in patients regardless of eGFR, with no difference in risk of hospitalization with bradycardia or hypotension.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)883-891
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume64
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • adverse events
  • Atenolol
  • beta-blocker
  • bradycardia
  • chronic kidney disease (CKD)
  • drug safety
  • elderly
  • hypotension
  • metoprolol tartrate
  • older adults
  • renal function

Cite this