Just a phone call away

Is telephone advice enough?

Nigel J. Balmer, Marisol Smith, Catrina Denvir, Ash Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the last two decades the public sector has embraced new modes of service delivery, with a shift away from traditional face-to-face provision towards Internet and telephone based advice and information. While telephone provision has played an increasingly significant role in overall provision of legal advice in recent years, there has been limited empirical research which compares telephone to face-to-face services. Utilising administrative data from the Legal Services Commission (LSC) on legal aid services for housing problems, this paper explores the similarities and differences between the two delivery modes. We examine the client groups and matter types which tend toward particular channels of advice, the relationship between mode of advice and the outcome of cases for clients and the relationship between mode of advice and advice time. We find that there are significant differences in mode of advice among clients with particular demographic characteristics, with clients under the age of 18 and clients living with an illness or disability more likely to use face-to-face services. Our findings also suggest differences among the types of problems being addressed by telephone based services. On the surface there are small differences between modes of advice and the proportion of cases which lead to a substantive benefit outcome. However, once we disaggregate the data and investigate specific outcomes, there are pronounced differences in the outcomes achieved. Having controlled for key variables such as client demographics, case type and particularly stage reached, we find that telephone advice takes, on average, 14 minutes longer than face-to-face advice (compared to an hour less when examining the raw data). The implications of these findings for the future development of telephone based services in light of current policy in legal services are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-85
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Social Welfare and Family Law
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2012

Keywords

  • civil justice
  • housing problems
  • legal aid
  • mode of access
  • telephone advice

Cite this

Balmer, Nigel J. ; Smith, Marisol ; Denvir, Catrina ; Patel, Ash. / Just a phone call away : Is telephone advice enough?. In: Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2012 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 63-85.
@article{08008651d34f4d8fb459466f1477eab4,
title = "Just a phone call away: Is telephone advice enough?",
abstract = "Over the last two decades the public sector has embraced new modes of service delivery, with a shift away from traditional face-to-face provision towards Internet and telephone based advice and information. While telephone provision has played an increasingly significant role in overall provision of legal advice in recent years, there has been limited empirical research which compares telephone to face-to-face services. Utilising administrative data from the Legal Services Commission (LSC) on legal aid services for housing problems, this paper explores the similarities and differences between the two delivery modes. We examine the client groups and matter types which tend toward particular channels of advice, the relationship between mode of advice and the outcome of cases for clients and the relationship between mode of advice and advice time. We find that there are significant differences in mode of advice among clients with particular demographic characteristics, with clients under the age of 18 and clients living with an illness or disability more likely to use face-to-face services. Our findings also suggest differences among the types of problems being addressed by telephone based services. On the surface there are small differences between modes of advice and the proportion of cases which lead to a substantive benefit outcome. However, once we disaggregate the data and investigate specific outcomes, there are pronounced differences in the outcomes achieved. Having controlled for key variables such as client demographics, case type and particularly stage reached, we find that telephone advice takes, on average, 14 minutes longer than face-to-face advice (compared to an hour less when examining the raw data). The implications of these findings for the future development of telephone based services in light of current policy in legal services are discussed.",
keywords = "civil justice, housing problems, legal aid, mode of access, telephone advice",
author = "Balmer, {Nigel J.} and Marisol Smith and Catrina Denvir and Ash Patel",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09649069.2012.675465",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "63--85",
journal = "Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law",
issn = "0964-9069",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Just a phone call away : Is telephone advice enough? / Balmer, Nigel J.; Smith, Marisol; Denvir, Catrina; Patel, Ash.

In: Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.03.2012, p. 63-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Just a phone call away

T2 - Is telephone advice enough?

AU - Balmer, Nigel J.

AU - Smith, Marisol

AU - Denvir, Catrina

AU - Patel, Ash

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Over the last two decades the public sector has embraced new modes of service delivery, with a shift away from traditional face-to-face provision towards Internet and telephone based advice and information. While telephone provision has played an increasingly significant role in overall provision of legal advice in recent years, there has been limited empirical research which compares telephone to face-to-face services. Utilising administrative data from the Legal Services Commission (LSC) on legal aid services for housing problems, this paper explores the similarities and differences between the two delivery modes. We examine the client groups and matter types which tend toward particular channels of advice, the relationship between mode of advice and the outcome of cases for clients and the relationship between mode of advice and advice time. We find that there are significant differences in mode of advice among clients with particular demographic characteristics, with clients under the age of 18 and clients living with an illness or disability more likely to use face-to-face services. Our findings also suggest differences among the types of problems being addressed by telephone based services. On the surface there are small differences between modes of advice and the proportion of cases which lead to a substantive benefit outcome. However, once we disaggregate the data and investigate specific outcomes, there are pronounced differences in the outcomes achieved. Having controlled for key variables such as client demographics, case type and particularly stage reached, we find that telephone advice takes, on average, 14 minutes longer than face-to-face advice (compared to an hour less when examining the raw data). The implications of these findings for the future development of telephone based services in light of current policy in legal services are discussed.

AB - Over the last two decades the public sector has embraced new modes of service delivery, with a shift away from traditional face-to-face provision towards Internet and telephone based advice and information. While telephone provision has played an increasingly significant role in overall provision of legal advice in recent years, there has been limited empirical research which compares telephone to face-to-face services. Utilising administrative data from the Legal Services Commission (LSC) on legal aid services for housing problems, this paper explores the similarities and differences between the two delivery modes. We examine the client groups and matter types which tend toward particular channels of advice, the relationship between mode of advice and the outcome of cases for clients and the relationship between mode of advice and advice time. We find that there are significant differences in mode of advice among clients with particular demographic characteristics, with clients under the age of 18 and clients living with an illness or disability more likely to use face-to-face services. Our findings also suggest differences among the types of problems being addressed by telephone based services. On the surface there are small differences between modes of advice and the proportion of cases which lead to a substantive benefit outcome. However, once we disaggregate the data and investigate specific outcomes, there are pronounced differences in the outcomes achieved. Having controlled for key variables such as client demographics, case type and particularly stage reached, we find that telephone advice takes, on average, 14 minutes longer than face-to-face advice (compared to an hour less when examining the raw data). The implications of these findings for the future development of telephone based services in light of current policy in legal services are discussed.

KW - civil justice

KW - housing problems

KW - legal aid

KW - mode of access

KW - telephone advice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863578370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09649069.2012.675465

DO - 10.1080/09649069.2012.675465

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 63

EP - 85

JO - Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

JF - Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

SN - 0964-9069

IS - 1

ER -