Judicial review of the fairness and reasonableness, as between class members, of federal class action settlements

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Settlement is the most common way in which federal class actions are resolved in Australia. In order to safeguard the interests of absent class members the settlement or discontinuance of class actions must be judicially approved. A crucial component of this judicial scrutiny entails a determination of whether the settlement in question gives preferential treatment to some class members over others and, if so, whether there are strong reasons that justify the approval of the settlement agreement notwithstanding this differential treatment. Despite the conceptual and practical importance of this dimension of the judicial review of class action settlements, it has been largely ignored in the legal literature. The aim of this article is to address this lacuna by exploring the way in which federal trial judges have, over the last 25 years or so, evaluated the fairness and reasonableness, between the class members inter se, of federal class action settlements.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)976-990
Number of pages15
JournalAustralian Law Journal
Volume92
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Cite this

@article{7dce70bce0cd46cc87e54fb569814b9c,
title = "Judicial review of the fairness and reasonableness, as between class members, of federal class action settlements",
abstract = "Settlement is the most common way in which federal class actions are resolved in Australia. In order to safeguard the interests of absent class members the settlement or discontinuance of class actions must be judicially approved. A crucial component of this judicial scrutiny entails a determination of whether the settlement in question gives preferential treatment to some class members over others and, if so, whether there are strong reasons that justify the approval of the settlement agreement notwithstanding this differential treatment. Despite the conceptual and practical importance of this dimension of the judicial review of class action settlements, it has been largely ignored in the legal literature. The aim of this article is to address this lacuna by exploring the way in which federal trial judges have, over the last 25 years or so, evaluated the fairness and reasonableness, between the class members inter se, of federal class action settlements.",
author = "Vince Morabito",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "976--990",
journal = "Australian Law Journal",
issn = "0004-9611",
publisher = "Thomson Reuters (Prous Science)",
number = "12",

}

Judicial review of the fairness and reasonableness, as between class members, of federal class action settlements. / Morabito, Vince.

In: Australian Law Journal, Vol. 92, No. 12, 12.2018, p. 976-990.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judicial review of the fairness and reasonableness, as between class members, of federal class action settlements

AU - Morabito, Vince

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - Settlement is the most common way in which federal class actions are resolved in Australia. In order to safeguard the interests of absent class members the settlement or discontinuance of class actions must be judicially approved. A crucial component of this judicial scrutiny entails a determination of whether the settlement in question gives preferential treatment to some class members over others and, if so, whether there are strong reasons that justify the approval of the settlement agreement notwithstanding this differential treatment. Despite the conceptual and practical importance of this dimension of the judicial review of class action settlements, it has been largely ignored in the legal literature. The aim of this article is to address this lacuna by exploring the way in which federal trial judges have, over the last 25 years or so, evaluated the fairness and reasonableness, between the class members inter se, of federal class action settlements.

AB - Settlement is the most common way in which federal class actions are resolved in Australia. In order to safeguard the interests of absent class members the settlement or discontinuance of class actions must be judicially approved. A crucial component of this judicial scrutiny entails a determination of whether the settlement in question gives preferential treatment to some class members over others and, if so, whether there are strong reasons that justify the approval of the settlement agreement notwithstanding this differential treatment. Despite the conceptual and practical importance of this dimension of the judicial review of class action settlements, it has been largely ignored in the legal literature. The aim of this article is to address this lacuna by exploring the way in which federal trial judges have, over the last 25 years or so, evaluated the fairness and reasonableness, between the class members inter se, of federal class action settlements.

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 976

EP - 990

JO - Australian Law Journal

JF - Australian Law Journal

SN - 0004-9611

IS - 12

ER -