Jerkies, tacos, and burgers: subjective socioeconomic status and meat preference

Eugene Y. Chan, Natalina Zlatevska

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In mankind's evolutionary past, those who consumed meat were strong and powerful and thus man saw meat as indicative of social status. This symbolic connection between meat and status persists today. Thus, based upon psychological theories of compensation, individuals low on subjective socioeconomic status (SES) should have a greater preference for meat, as meat may be substitutable for the status that they lack. Three experiments tested this premise. Participants who felt low on subjective SES preferred meat-based foods compared to participants who felt high on it (Experiment 1). The effect is driven by a desire for status (Experiments 2–3) and not by felt hunger or power (Experiments 1–2) and not generalizable to plant foods (Experiment 3). The results suggest a symbolic link between meat and status, which has intriguingly not yet been empirically shown, and we also demonstrate a consequence of the link for food preference. The results may be of use for doctors who advise eating less meat to improve physical health and for environmental advocates who argue that meat consumption exacerbates global warming. We will also discuss the contributions of and further avenues based on our work.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-266
Number of pages10
JournalAppetite
Volume132
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

Keywords

  • Food preference
  • Health
  • Meat
  • Public policy
  • Subjective socioeconomic status
  • Sustainability

Cite this

@article{af2a4518e1e44cf9abbce1733d89a0b1,
title = "Jerkies, tacos, and burgers: subjective socioeconomic status and meat preference",
abstract = "In mankind's evolutionary past, those who consumed meat were strong and powerful and thus man saw meat as indicative of social status. This symbolic connection between meat and status persists today. Thus, based upon psychological theories of compensation, individuals low on subjective socioeconomic status (SES) should have a greater preference for meat, as meat may be substitutable for the status that they lack. Three experiments tested this premise. Participants who felt low on subjective SES preferred meat-based foods compared to participants who felt high on it (Experiment 1). The effect is driven by a desire for status (Experiments 2–3) and not by felt hunger or power (Experiments 1–2) and not generalizable to plant foods (Experiment 3). The results suggest a symbolic link between meat and status, which has intriguingly not yet been empirically shown, and we also demonstrate a consequence of the link for food preference. The results may be of use for doctors who advise eating less meat to improve physical health and for environmental advocates who argue that meat consumption exacerbates global warming. We will also discuss the contributions of and further avenues based on our work.",
keywords = "Food preference, Health, Meat, Public policy, Subjective socioeconomic status, Sustainability",
author = "Chan, {Eugene Y.} and Natalina Zlatevska",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.027",
language = "English",
volume = "132",
pages = "257--266",
journal = "Appetite",
issn = "0195-6663",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Jerkies, tacos, and burgers : subjective socioeconomic status and meat preference. / Chan, Eugene Y.; Zlatevska, Natalina.

In: Appetite, Vol. 132, 01.2019, p. 257-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Jerkies, tacos, and burgers

T2 - subjective socioeconomic status and meat preference

AU - Chan, Eugene Y.

AU - Zlatevska, Natalina

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - In mankind's evolutionary past, those who consumed meat were strong and powerful and thus man saw meat as indicative of social status. This symbolic connection between meat and status persists today. Thus, based upon psychological theories of compensation, individuals low on subjective socioeconomic status (SES) should have a greater preference for meat, as meat may be substitutable for the status that they lack. Three experiments tested this premise. Participants who felt low on subjective SES preferred meat-based foods compared to participants who felt high on it (Experiment 1). The effect is driven by a desire for status (Experiments 2–3) and not by felt hunger or power (Experiments 1–2) and not generalizable to plant foods (Experiment 3). The results suggest a symbolic link between meat and status, which has intriguingly not yet been empirically shown, and we also demonstrate a consequence of the link for food preference. The results may be of use for doctors who advise eating less meat to improve physical health and for environmental advocates who argue that meat consumption exacerbates global warming. We will also discuss the contributions of and further avenues based on our work.

AB - In mankind's evolutionary past, those who consumed meat were strong and powerful and thus man saw meat as indicative of social status. This symbolic connection between meat and status persists today. Thus, based upon psychological theories of compensation, individuals low on subjective socioeconomic status (SES) should have a greater preference for meat, as meat may be substitutable for the status that they lack. Three experiments tested this premise. Participants who felt low on subjective SES preferred meat-based foods compared to participants who felt high on it (Experiment 1). The effect is driven by a desire for status (Experiments 2–3) and not by felt hunger or power (Experiments 1–2) and not generalizable to plant foods (Experiment 3). The results suggest a symbolic link between meat and status, which has intriguingly not yet been empirically shown, and we also demonstrate a consequence of the link for food preference. The results may be of use for doctors who advise eating less meat to improve physical health and for environmental advocates who argue that meat consumption exacerbates global warming. We will also discuss the contributions of and further avenues based on our work.

KW - Food preference

KW - Health

KW - Meat

KW - Public policy

KW - Subjective socioeconomic status

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054136264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.027

DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.027

M3 - Article

VL - 132

SP - 257

EP - 266

JO - Appetite

JF - Appetite

SN - 0195-6663

ER -