'It's okay to be racist': Moral disengagement in online discussions of racist incidents in Australia

Nicholas Faulkner, Ana-Maria Bliuc

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Racist views expressed on the Internet have damaging consequences for social harmony and well-being. This article examines how and why individuals express support or opposition to racist behaviour in a prominent online medium: comments on news websites. Specifically, we examine how supporters and opponents of racist behaviour use a particular type of subtle discursive strategies known as moral disengagement in their online responses to three notable racist incidents that occurred in Australia in 2013. Moral disengagement strategies allow individuals to avoid distress, self-condemnation, and social-sanctions when supporting or engaging in harmful behaviour by making that behaviour appear moral and acceptable. We show that supporters, but not opponents, of racist behaviour consistently use moral disengagement strategies in their rhetoric, and demonstrate that moral disengagement provides a powerful theoretical framework through which racist rhetoric on online news websites can be understood.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2545-2563
Number of pages19
JournalEthnic and Racial Studies
Volume39
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Racism
  • cyber-racism
  • moral disengagement
  • discourse
  • mixed-methods
  • Internet

Cite this

@article{f6b4cd5532b540b494d64a1c083f917d,
title = "'It's okay to be racist': Moral disengagement in online discussions of racist incidents in Australia",
abstract = "Racist views expressed on the Internet have damaging consequences for social harmony and well-being. This article examines how and why individuals express support or opposition to racist behaviour in a prominent online medium: comments on news websites. Specifically, we examine how supporters and opponents of racist behaviour use a particular type of subtle discursive strategies known as moral disengagement in their online responses to three notable racist incidents that occurred in Australia in 2013. Moral disengagement strategies allow individuals to avoid distress, self-condemnation, and social-sanctions when supporting or engaging in harmful behaviour by making that behaviour appear moral and acceptable. We show that supporters, but not opponents, of racist behaviour consistently use moral disengagement strategies in their rhetoric, and demonstrate that moral disengagement provides a powerful theoretical framework through which racist rhetoric on online news websites can be understood.",
keywords = "Racism, cyber-racism, moral disengagement, discourse, mixed-methods, Internet",
author = "Nicholas Faulkner and Ana-Maria Bliuc",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/01419870.2016.1171370",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "2545--2563",
journal = "Ethnic and Racial Studies",
issn = "0141-9870",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "14",

}

'It's okay to be racist' : Moral disengagement in online discussions of racist incidents in Australia. / Faulkner, Nicholas; Bliuc, Ana-Maria.

In: Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 39, No. 14, 2016, p. 2545-2563.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'It's okay to be racist'

T2 - Moral disengagement in online discussions of racist incidents in Australia

AU - Faulkner, Nicholas

AU - Bliuc, Ana-Maria

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Racist views expressed on the Internet have damaging consequences for social harmony and well-being. This article examines how and why individuals express support or opposition to racist behaviour in a prominent online medium: comments on news websites. Specifically, we examine how supporters and opponents of racist behaviour use a particular type of subtle discursive strategies known as moral disengagement in their online responses to three notable racist incidents that occurred in Australia in 2013. Moral disengagement strategies allow individuals to avoid distress, self-condemnation, and social-sanctions when supporting or engaging in harmful behaviour by making that behaviour appear moral and acceptable. We show that supporters, but not opponents, of racist behaviour consistently use moral disengagement strategies in their rhetoric, and demonstrate that moral disengagement provides a powerful theoretical framework through which racist rhetoric on online news websites can be understood.

AB - Racist views expressed on the Internet have damaging consequences for social harmony and well-being. This article examines how and why individuals express support or opposition to racist behaviour in a prominent online medium: comments on news websites. Specifically, we examine how supporters and opponents of racist behaviour use a particular type of subtle discursive strategies known as moral disengagement in their online responses to three notable racist incidents that occurred in Australia in 2013. Moral disengagement strategies allow individuals to avoid distress, self-condemnation, and social-sanctions when supporting or engaging in harmful behaviour by making that behaviour appear moral and acceptable. We show that supporters, but not opponents, of racist behaviour consistently use moral disengagement strategies in their rhetoric, and demonstrate that moral disengagement provides a powerful theoretical framework through which racist rhetoric on online news websites can be understood.

KW - Racism

KW - cyber-racism

KW - moral disengagement

KW - discourse

KW - mixed-methods

KW - Internet

U2 - 10.1080/01419870.2016.1171370

DO - 10.1080/01419870.2016.1171370

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 2545

EP - 2563

JO - Ethnic and Racial Studies

JF - Ethnic and Racial Studies

SN - 0141-9870

IS - 14

ER -