TY - JOUR
T1 - It’s a small bit of advice, but actually on the day, made such a difference…
T2 - perceptions of quality in abortion care in England and Wales
AU - Whitehouse, Katherine C.
AU - Blaylock, Rebecca
AU - Makleff, Shelly
AU - Lohr, Patricia A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to acknowledge the contributions of those who agreed to be interviewed. We are grateful for staff assistance at the following BPAS clinics: Birmingham South, Brighton, Bournemouth, Cardiff, Doncaster, Newcastle, Middlesbrough Streatham, and South Shields. We thank Maxine Taylor for creating recruitment materials and Jeanette Taylor for research administration and recruitment. Sara Lykke Madsen helped with recruitment and interviewing. Teresa DePi?eres assisted with study implementation.
Funding Information:
The funding for this research was provided internally by BPAS.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/11/7
Y1 - 2021/11/7
N2 - Background: Quality of care (QOC) is increasingly identified as an important contributor to healthcare outcomes, however little agreement exists on what constitutes quality in abortion care or the recommended indicators from the service-user perspective. Our study aimed to explore perceptions and experiences of abortion QOC in England and Wales. Methods: We performed in-depth interviews (via phone or in-person) with participants who had an abortion at a nationwide independent sector provider in the previous 6 months. We explored their experiences of the abortion service at each point in the care pathway, their perspectives on what contributed to and detracted from the experience meeting their definitions of quality, and their reflections on different aspects of QOC. We used content analysis to generate themes. Results: From December 2018 to July 2019, we conducted 24 interviews. Ten participants had a surgical and 14 had a medical abortion. Seventeen (71%) were treated in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy and 7 (29%) beyond that, with an average gestational age of 10 weeks + 5 days (range 5–23 + 6). We identified 4 major themes that contributed to participant’s perception of high quality care: (1) interpersonal interactions with staff or other patients, (2) being informed and prepared, (3) participation and choices in care and (4) accessibility. Nearly all participants identified interpersonal interactions with staff as an important contributor to quality with positive interactions often cited as the best part of their abortion experience and negative interactions as the worst. For information and preparation, participant described not only the importance of being well prepared, but how incongruencies between information and the actual experience detracted from quality. Participants said that making choices about their care, for example, method of abortion, was a positive contributor. Finally, participants identified access to care, specifically in relation to waiting times and travel, as an important aspect of QOC. Conclusions: Participants situated quality in abortion care in 4 domains: interpersonal aspects of care, information and preparation, choices, and accessibility. Indicators identified can be used to develop standard metrics to ensure care meets service-user needs.
AB - Background: Quality of care (QOC) is increasingly identified as an important contributor to healthcare outcomes, however little agreement exists on what constitutes quality in abortion care or the recommended indicators from the service-user perspective. Our study aimed to explore perceptions and experiences of abortion QOC in England and Wales. Methods: We performed in-depth interviews (via phone or in-person) with participants who had an abortion at a nationwide independent sector provider in the previous 6 months. We explored their experiences of the abortion service at each point in the care pathway, their perspectives on what contributed to and detracted from the experience meeting their definitions of quality, and their reflections on different aspects of QOC. We used content analysis to generate themes. Results: From December 2018 to July 2019, we conducted 24 interviews. Ten participants had a surgical and 14 had a medical abortion. Seventeen (71%) were treated in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy and 7 (29%) beyond that, with an average gestational age of 10 weeks + 5 days (range 5–23 + 6). We identified 4 major themes that contributed to participant’s perception of high quality care: (1) interpersonal interactions with staff or other patients, (2) being informed and prepared, (3) participation and choices in care and (4) accessibility. Nearly all participants identified interpersonal interactions with staff as an important contributor to quality with positive interactions often cited as the best part of their abortion experience and negative interactions as the worst. For information and preparation, participant described not only the importance of being well prepared, but how incongruencies between information and the actual experience detracted from quality. Participants said that making choices about their care, for example, method of abortion, was a positive contributor. Finally, participants identified access to care, specifically in relation to waiting times and travel, as an important aspect of QOC. Conclusions: Participants situated quality in abortion care in 4 domains: interpersonal aspects of care, information and preparation, choices, and accessibility. Indicators identified can be used to develop standard metrics to ensure care meets service-user needs.
KW - Abortion
KW - Health services research
KW - Qualitative research
KW - Quality improvement
KW - Quality of care
KW - Termination of pregnancy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118737260&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12978-021-01270-0
DO - 10.1186/s12978-021-01270-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 34743705
AN - SCOPUS:85118737260
VL - 18
JO - Reproductive Health
JF - Reproductive Health
SN - 1742-4755
IS - 1
M1 - 221
ER -