Issues and trends in causal ambiguity research

a review and assessment

Stefan Konlechner, Véronique Ambrosini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Causal ambiguity relates to ambiguity as to how organizational actions and results, inputs and outcomes, or competencies and advantage are linked. Causal ambiguity is important because of its organizational performance implications. Over the last 25 years, research has analyzed the concept from various theoretical angles. As a result, the literature is fragmented and presents different, and sometimes contradictory, views on the concept. In this article, we systematically review the literature on causal ambiguity and develop a framework incorporating the types, antecedents, and consequences of causal ambiguity for both organizational performance and organizational learning. We disentangle the arrays of conceptualizations and operationalizations present in the literature, and we isolate distinct streams in causal ambiguity research. One stream of research concentrates on causal ambiguity as an interfirm barrier to imitation, a second relates to causal ambiguity as an intrafirm barrier to factor mobility, and a third focuses on causal ambiguity as a potential trigger for intrafirm learning. Our review also helps to consolidate research on the substitution dilemma, the causal ambiguity paradox, and the challenge of learning under causal ambiguity. Finally, we develop a coherent set of implications for management practice, and we provide an agenda for further research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2352-2386
Number of pages35
JournalJournal of Management
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

Keywords

  • behavioral theory of the firm
  • causal ambiguity
  • decision-making
  • decisions under risk/uncertainty
  • organizational learning
  • resource-based view

Cite this

@article{a390208358e3483f82c698fe0c92a18a,
title = "Issues and trends in causal ambiguity research: a review and assessment",
abstract = "Causal ambiguity relates to ambiguity as to how organizational actions and results, inputs and outcomes, or competencies and advantage are linked. Causal ambiguity is important because of its organizational performance implications. Over the last 25 years, research has analyzed the concept from various theoretical angles. As a result, the literature is fragmented and presents different, and sometimes contradictory, views on the concept. In this article, we systematically review the literature on causal ambiguity and develop a framework incorporating the types, antecedents, and consequences of causal ambiguity for both organizational performance and organizational learning. We disentangle the arrays of conceptualizations and operationalizations present in the literature, and we isolate distinct streams in causal ambiguity research. One stream of research concentrates on causal ambiguity as an interfirm barrier to imitation, a second relates to causal ambiguity as an intrafirm barrier to factor mobility, and a third focuses on causal ambiguity as a potential trigger for intrafirm learning. Our review also helps to consolidate research on the substitution dilemma, the causal ambiguity paradox, and the challenge of learning under causal ambiguity. Finally, we develop a coherent set of implications for management practice, and we provide an agenda for further research.",
keywords = "behavioral theory of the firm, causal ambiguity, decision-making, decisions under risk/uncertainty, organizational learning, resource-based view",
author = "Stefan Konlechner and V{\'e}ronique Ambrosini",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1177/0149206319836163",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "2352--2386",
journal = "Journal of Management",
issn = "0149-2063",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Issues and trends in causal ambiguity research : a review and assessment. / Konlechner, Stefan; Ambrosini, Véronique.

In: Journal of Management, Vol. 45, No. 6, 07.2019, p. 2352-2386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Issues and trends in causal ambiguity research

T2 - a review and assessment

AU - Konlechner, Stefan

AU - Ambrosini, Véronique

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - Causal ambiguity relates to ambiguity as to how organizational actions and results, inputs and outcomes, or competencies and advantage are linked. Causal ambiguity is important because of its organizational performance implications. Over the last 25 years, research has analyzed the concept from various theoretical angles. As a result, the literature is fragmented and presents different, and sometimes contradictory, views on the concept. In this article, we systematically review the literature on causal ambiguity and develop a framework incorporating the types, antecedents, and consequences of causal ambiguity for both organizational performance and organizational learning. We disentangle the arrays of conceptualizations and operationalizations present in the literature, and we isolate distinct streams in causal ambiguity research. One stream of research concentrates on causal ambiguity as an interfirm barrier to imitation, a second relates to causal ambiguity as an intrafirm barrier to factor mobility, and a third focuses on causal ambiguity as a potential trigger for intrafirm learning. Our review also helps to consolidate research on the substitution dilemma, the causal ambiguity paradox, and the challenge of learning under causal ambiguity. Finally, we develop a coherent set of implications for management practice, and we provide an agenda for further research.

AB - Causal ambiguity relates to ambiguity as to how organizational actions and results, inputs and outcomes, or competencies and advantage are linked. Causal ambiguity is important because of its organizational performance implications. Over the last 25 years, research has analyzed the concept from various theoretical angles. As a result, the literature is fragmented and presents different, and sometimes contradictory, views on the concept. In this article, we systematically review the literature on causal ambiguity and develop a framework incorporating the types, antecedents, and consequences of causal ambiguity for both organizational performance and organizational learning. We disentangle the arrays of conceptualizations and operationalizations present in the literature, and we isolate distinct streams in causal ambiguity research. One stream of research concentrates on causal ambiguity as an interfirm barrier to imitation, a second relates to causal ambiguity as an intrafirm barrier to factor mobility, and a third focuses on causal ambiguity as a potential trigger for intrafirm learning. Our review also helps to consolidate research on the substitution dilemma, the causal ambiguity paradox, and the challenge of learning under causal ambiguity. Finally, we develop a coherent set of implications for management practice, and we provide an agenda for further research.

KW - behavioral theory of the firm

KW - causal ambiguity

KW - decision-making

KW - decisions under risk/uncertainty

KW - organizational learning

KW - resource-based view

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063010058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0149206319836163

DO - 10.1177/0149206319836163

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 2352

EP - 2386

JO - Journal of Management

JF - Journal of Management

SN - 0149-2063

IS - 6

ER -