TY - JOUR
T1 - Is there still a role for abatacept in the treatment of lupus?
AU - Hoi, Alberta
AU - Littlejohn, Geoffrey Owen
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - The quest for safer and more effective treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has led to the development of many new biologic therapies. Abatacept is the first drug targeting co-stimulation between T cells and antigen presenting cells, with abundant pre-clinical evidence to support its use in SLE. AREAS COVERED: This review will present the relevant aspects of lupus pathophysiology pertaining to the mechanism of action of abatacept, a summary of murine studies and the latest human clinical trials. EXPERT OPINION: Abatacept has demonstrated efficacy in both rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis, and earlier studies have suggested tantalising evidence of efficacy in SLE. However, the latest randomised double-blinded study showed disappointingly negative results, much like the case of rituximab in SLE. Currently, abatacept remains a possible therapeutic option as an off-label therapy, and it is a part of our therapeutic armamentarium in difficult cases. The need to find appropriate definitions of response and optimal study design continues to be paramount in the field of lupus therapies.
AB - The quest for safer and more effective treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has led to the development of many new biologic therapies. Abatacept is the first drug targeting co-stimulation between T cells and antigen presenting cells, with abundant pre-clinical evidence to support its use in SLE. AREAS COVERED: This review will present the relevant aspects of lupus pathophysiology pertaining to the mechanism of action of abatacept, a summary of murine studies and the latest human clinical trials. EXPERT OPINION: Abatacept has demonstrated efficacy in both rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis, and earlier studies have suggested tantalising evidence of efficacy in SLE. However, the latest randomised double-blinded study showed disappointingly negative results, much like the case of rituximab in SLE. Currently, abatacept remains a possible therapeutic option as an off-label therapy, and it is a part of our therapeutic armamentarium in difficult cases. The need to find appropriate definitions of response and optimal study design continues to be paramount in the field of lupus therapies.
UR - http://informahealthcare.com/doi/pdf/10.1517/14712598.2014.935329
U2 - 10.1517/14712598.2014.935329
DO - 10.1517/14712598.2014.935329
M3 - Article
SN - 1471-2598
VL - 14
SP - 1345
EP - 1350
JO - Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
JF - Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
IS - 9
ER -