Is sustainability reporting becoming institutionalised? The role of an issues-based field

Colin Higgins, Wendy Stubbs, Markus Milne

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    We study companies that do not produce a sustainability report in contexts where institutionalisation is assumed. Based on a careful analysis of interaction patterns between non-reporting companies, sustainability interest groups, and peer organisations, we find patterns of discursive and material isomorphism that suggest sustainability reporting is confined to an issues-based field, rather than spreading as an institutionalised practice across the business community. We argue that the issues-based field exerts only weak pressure for sustainability reporting, and that encouraging more firms to report rests on understanding what influences companies to interact more widely to become part of this field.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)309-326
    Number of pages18
    JournalJournal of Business Ethics
    Volume147
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Keywords

    • Australia
    • Institutional theory
    • Issues-based fields
    • Sustainability reporting
    • Non-reporters

    Cite this

    @article{3fe51883e5fa4bb78b675982cc3c95ef,
    title = "Is sustainability reporting becoming institutionalised? The role of an issues-based field",
    abstract = "We study companies that do not produce a sustainability report in contexts where institutionalisation is assumed. Based on a careful analysis of interaction patterns between non-reporting companies, sustainability interest groups, and peer organisations, we find patterns of discursive and material isomorphism that suggest sustainability reporting is confined to an issues-based field, rather than spreading as an institutionalised practice across the business community. We argue that the issues-based field exerts only weak pressure for sustainability reporting, and that encouraging more firms to report rests on understanding what influences companies to interact more widely to become part of this field.",
    keywords = "Australia, Institutional theory, Issues-based fields, Sustainability reporting, Non-reporters",
    author = "Colin Higgins and Wendy Stubbs and Markus Milne",
    year = "2018",
    doi = "10.1007/s10551-015-2931-7",
    language = "English",
    volume = "147",
    pages = "309--326",
    journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
    issn = "0167-4544",
    publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
    number = "2",

    }

    Is sustainability reporting becoming institutionalised? The role of an issues-based field. / Higgins, Colin; Stubbs, Wendy; Milne, Markus.

    In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 147, No. 2, 2018, p. 309-326.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Is sustainability reporting becoming institutionalised? The role of an issues-based field

    AU - Higgins, Colin

    AU - Stubbs, Wendy

    AU - Milne, Markus

    PY - 2018

    Y1 - 2018

    N2 - We study companies that do not produce a sustainability report in contexts where institutionalisation is assumed. Based on a careful analysis of interaction patterns between non-reporting companies, sustainability interest groups, and peer organisations, we find patterns of discursive and material isomorphism that suggest sustainability reporting is confined to an issues-based field, rather than spreading as an institutionalised practice across the business community. We argue that the issues-based field exerts only weak pressure for sustainability reporting, and that encouraging more firms to report rests on understanding what influences companies to interact more widely to become part of this field.

    AB - We study companies that do not produce a sustainability report in contexts where institutionalisation is assumed. Based on a careful analysis of interaction patterns between non-reporting companies, sustainability interest groups, and peer organisations, we find patterns of discursive and material isomorphism that suggest sustainability reporting is confined to an issues-based field, rather than spreading as an institutionalised practice across the business community. We argue that the issues-based field exerts only weak pressure for sustainability reporting, and that encouraging more firms to report rests on understanding what influences companies to interact more widely to become part of this field.

    KW - Australia

    KW - Institutional theory

    KW - Issues-based fields

    KW - Sustainability reporting

    KW - Non-reporters

    U2 - 10.1007/s10551-015-2931-7

    DO - 10.1007/s10551-015-2931-7

    M3 - Article

    VL - 147

    SP - 309

    EP - 326

    JO - Journal of Business Ethics

    JF - Journal of Business Ethics

    SN - 0167-4544

    IS - 2

    ER -