TY - JOUR
T1 - Is chemotherapy dose intensity adequate in breast cancer management in the Australian healthcare setting
T2 - A retrospective analysis
AU - Bae, Susie
AU - Yeung, Yvonne
AU - Ng, Say
AU - Craike, Melinda
AU - Livingston, Patricia M.
AU - Chirgwin, Jacquie
PY - 2014/6
Y1 - 2014/6
N2 - Aim: To determine the adequacy of chemotherapy received dose intensity (RDI) in breast cancer treatment in a general population and to identify factors that influence RDI. Methods: A retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients who commenced a course of i.v. chemotherapy in 2008 was undertaken. Data were collected on patient and tumor characteristics, chemotherapy regimen, dose (including delays, reductions and the reasons for these), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use and febrile neutropenia incidence. RDI was calculated using the planned and actual dose received and time taken. A level of ≥85% RDI was considered acceptable for treatment given with curative intent. Results: In all, 131 patients (aged 28 to 77 years) received chemotherapy in adjuvant (n=76, 58%), neoadjuvant (n=11, 8%) and metastatic settings (n=44, 34%). RDI did not reach 85% for 12% adjuvant, 36% neoadjuvant and 34% metastatic cases (χ2=10.55, P=0.005). Overall, 43% of patients received G-CSF. Conclusion: Acceptable chemotherapy RDI was delivered for most patients in the adjuvant setting but not in the neoadjuvant setting. G-CSF treatment contributed to the optimization of dose intensity in the adjuvant setting only. Dose intensity in the metastatic setting was considered satisfactory where quality of life is the primary focus. Other factors can be modified to improve RDI.
AB - Aim: To determine the adequacy of chemotherapy received dose intensity (RDI) in breast cancer treatment in a general population and to identify factors that influence RDI. Methods: A retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients who commenced a course of i.v. chemotherapy in 2008 was undertaken. Data were collected on patient and tumor characteristics, chemotherapy regimen, dose (including delays, reductions and the reasons for these), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use and febrile neutropenia incidence. RDI was calculated using the planned and actual dose received and time taken. A level of ≥85% RDI was considered acceptable for treatment given with curative intent. Results: In all, 131 patients (aged 28 to 77 years) received chemotherapy in adjuvant (n=76, 58%), neoadjuvant (n=11, 8%) and metastatic settings (n=44, 34%). RDI did not reach 85% for 12% adjuvant, 36% neoadjuvant and 34% metastatic cases (χ2=10.55, P=0.005). Overall, 43% of patients received G-CSF. Conclusion: Acceptable chemotherapy RDI was delivered for most patients in the adjuvant setting but not in the neoadjuvant setting. G-CSF treatment contributed to the optimization of dose intensity in the adjuvant setting only. Dose intensity in the metastatic setting was considered satisfactory where quality of life is the primary focus. Other factors can be modified to improve RDI.
KW - Breast neoplasm
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Dose intensity
KW - Febrile neutropenia
KW - Growth colony stimulating factor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901403626&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2012.01591.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2012.01591.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84901403626
VL - 10
SP - e54-e62
JO - Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
SN - 1743-7555
IS - 2
ER -