Is Cesarean section the right outcome for induction of labor trials? Impact of sample size and primary outcomes

K. Swarnamani; L. S. Smits; K. Palmer; B. W. Mol; M. Davies-Tuck

doi:10.1002/uog.22044

Is Cesarean section the right outcome for induction of labor trials? Impact of sample size and primary outcomes

K. Swarnamani, L. S. Smits, K. Palmer, B. W. Mol, M. Davies-Tuck

Obstetrics & Gynaecology Monash Health

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment / Debate › Other › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	645-646
Number of pages	2
Journal	Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume	56
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22044
Publication status	Published - 1 Nov 2020

Access to Document

10.1002/uog.22044

Cite this

@article{3db1d61e5a624faca6f1f217b8bca4b0,

title = "Is Cesarean section the right outcome for induction of labor trials? Impact of sample size and primary outcomes",

author = "K. Swarnamani and Smits, \{L. S.\} and K. Palmer and Mol, \{B. W.\} and M. Davies-Tuck",

year = "2020",

month = nov,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/uog.22044",

language = "English",

volume = "56",

pages = "645--646",

journal = "Ultrasound in Obstetrics \& Gynecology",

issn = "0960-7692",

publisher = "John Wiley \& Sons",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is Cesarean section the right outcome for induction of labor trials? Impact of sample size and primary outcomes

AU - Swarnamani, K.

AU - Smits, L. S.

AU - Palmer, K.

AU - Mol, B. W.

AU - Davies-Tuck, M.

PY - 2020/11/1

Y1 - 2020/11/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85094959788

U2 - 10.1002/uog.22044

DO - 10.1002/uog.22044

M3 - Comment / Debate

C2 - 32275105

AN - SCOPUS:85094959788

SN - 0960-7692

VL - 56

SP - 645

EP - 646

JO - Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

JF - Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

IS - 5

ER -

Is Cesarean section the right outcome for induction of labor trials? Impact of sample size and primary outcomes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this