IPO lockups, long run returns, and growth opportunities

Janto Haman, Keryn Chalmers, Victor Fang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence suggests that IPO firms have negative returns and declining growth opportunities in the years post listing. We explore whether lockup type influences such returns and growth opportunities. Specifically, we investigate long run returns and growth opportunities of mandatory and non-mandatory lockup firms. We find that long run returns (growth opportunities) for mandatory lockup firms are significantly lower (higher) than for non-mandatory lockup firms. Examining the influence of corporate governance on these associations, we find that good corporate governance is positively associated with long run returns for both lockup type firms, with the differential effect insignificant. We also find that the listing survival rate of mandatory lockup firms is higher than for non-mandatory lockup firms. Further analysis reveals that the incremental effect of smaller firm size on higher growth opportunities is stronger for mandatory lockup firms relative to non-mandatory lockup firms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)184-199
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money
Volume49
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2017

Keywords

  • IPO
  • Lockups
  • Long run returns
  • Growth opportunities
  • corporate governance

Cite this

@article{5bd33bd3f4ed4b948f44343460b9d76c,
title = "IPO lockups, long run returns, and growth opportunities",
abstract = "Evidence suggests that IPO firms have negative returns and declining growth opportunities in the years post listing. We explore whether lockup type influences such returns and growth opportunities. Specifically, we investigate long run returns and growth opportunities of mandatory and non-mandatory lockup firms. We find that long run returns (growth opportunities) for mandatory lockup firms are significantly lower (higher) than for non-mandatory lockup firms. Examining the influence of corporate governance on these associations, we find that good corporate governance is positively associated with long run returns for both lockup type firms, with the differential effect insignificant. We also find that the listing survival rate of mandatory lockup firms is higher than for non-mandatory lockup firms. Further analysis reveals that the incremental effect of smaller firm size on higher growth opportunities is stronger for mandatory lockup firms relative to non-mandatory lockup firms.",
keywords = "IPO, Lockups, Long run returns, Growth opportunities, corporate governance",
author = "Janto Haman and Keryn Chalmers and Victor Fang",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.intfin.2017.05.002",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "184--199",
journal = "Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money",
issn = "1042-4431",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

IPO lockups, long run returns, and growth opportunities. / Haman, Janto; Chalmers, Keryn; Fang, Victor.

In: Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Vol. 49, 07.2017, p. 184-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - IPO lockups, long run returns, and growth opportunities

AU - Haman, Janto

AU - Chalmers, Keryn

AU - Fang, Victor

PY - 2017/7

Y1 - 2017/7

N2 - Evidence suggests that IPO firms have negative returns and declining growth opportunities in the years post listing. We explore whether lockup type influences such returns and growth opportunities. Specifically, we investigate long run returns and growth opportunities of mandatory and non-mandatory lockup firms. We find that long run returns (growth opportunities) for mandatory lockup firms are significantly lower (higher) than for non-mandatory lockup firms. Examining the influence of corporate governance on these associations, we find that good corporate governance is positively associated with long run returns for both lockup type firms, with the differential effect insignificant. We also find that the listing survival rate of mandatory lockup firms is higher than for non-mandatory lockup firms. Further analysis reveals that the incremental effect of smaller firm size on higher growth opportunities is stronger for mandatory lockup firms relative to non-mandatory lockup firms.

AB - Evidence suggests that IPO firms have negative returns and declining growth opportunities in the years post listing. We explore whether lockup type influences such returns and growth opportunities. Specifically, we investigate long run returns and growth opportunities of mandatory and non-mandatory lockup firms. We find that long run returns (growth opportunities) for mandatory lockup firms are significantly lower (higher) than for non-mandatory lockup firms. Examining the influence of corporate governance on these associations, we find that good corporate governance is positively associated with long run returns for both lockup type firms, with the differential effect insignificant. We also find that the listing survival rate of mandatory lockup firms is higher than for non-mandatory lockup firms. Further analysis reveals that the incremental effect of smaller firm size on higher growth opportunities is stronger for mandatory lockup firms relative to non-mandatory lockup firms.

KW - IPO

KW - Lockups

KW - Long run returns

KW - Growth opportunities

KW - corporate governance

U2 - 10.1016/j.intfin.2017.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.intfin.2017.05.002

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 184

EP - 199

JO - Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money

JF - Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money

SN - 1042-4431

ER -