Investor’s choice of Shariah compliant ‘replicas’ and original Islamic instruments

Saad Azmat, Muhammad Naiman Jalil, Michael Thomas Skully, Kym Eva Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper offers a behavioral perspective on why Islamic capital markets are dominated by those financial instruments that almost replicate conventional financial products (i.e.Islamic debt bonds and Islamic equities). In contrast, the original Islamic instruments involving risk and return sharing (Musharakah) have failed to emerge. This paper argues that before the replicas, an investor’s choice was simply between Islamic and non-Islamic instruments. Along with risk and return, compliance with Islamic principles or Shariah was an integral part of investor utility. As Shariah standards came to give legitimacy to other financial structures, the investors could then choose between various Islamic replicas and the original Islamic instruments. We argue that once the investor’s intrinsic need for Shariah compliance is fulfilled, an instrument’s risk-return features would become more important.So for loss averse investors with shorter evaluation periods, the loss sharing feature of the Islamic risk and return instruments (Musharkah) makes them less attractive than Islamic debt bonds. For longer evaluation periods, Islamic equities are also shown to out-perform the risk and return (Musharakah) instruments. Using the S&P Islamic bond index for bond data and the Dow Jones Islamic Market World Index for Islamic equities, we confirm these views about investor utility by way of both loss aversion and habit based consumption models. The findings suggest that Islamic debt bonds and Islamic equities have been allowed to jointly crowd out the original Islamic risk and return (Musharakah) instruments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-22
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Volume132
Issue numberSupplement
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Islamic instrument
  • investor behavior

Cite this

@article{db987eb139ab4004b3c055fbbb924fa2,
title = "Investor’s choice of Shariah compliant ‘replicas’ and original Islamic instruments",
abstract = "This paper offers a behavioral perspective on why Islamic capital markets are dominated by those financial instruments that almost replicate conventional financial products (i.e.Islamic debt bonds and Islamic equities). In contrast, the original Islamic instruments involving risk and return sharing (Musharakah) have failed to emerge. This paper argues that before the replicas, an investor’s choice was simply between Islamic and non-Islamic instruments. Along with risk and return, compliance with Islamic principles or Shariah was an integral part of investor utility. As Shariah standards came to give legitimacy to other financial structures, the investors could then choose between various Islamic replicas and the original Islamic instruments. We argue that once the investor’s intrinsic need for Shariah compliance is fulfilled, an instrument’s risk-return features would become more important.So for loss averse investors with shorter evaluation periods, the loss sharing feature of the Islamic risk and return instruments (Musharkah) makes them less attractive than Islamic debt bonds. For longer evaluation periods, Islamic equities are also shown to out-perform the risk and return (Musharakah) instruments. Using the S&P Islamic bond index for bond data and the Dow Jones Islamic Market World Index for Islamic equities, we confirm these views about investor utility by way of both loss aversion and habit based consumption models. The findings suggest that Islamic debt bonds and Islamic equities have been allowed to jointly crowd out the original Islamic risk and return (Musharakah) instruments.",
keywords = "Islamic instrument, investor behavior",
author = "Saad Azmat and Jalil, {Muhammad Naiman} and Skully, {Michael Thomas} and Brown, {Kym Eva}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.jebo.2016.07.018",
language = "English",
volume = "132",
pages = "4--22",
journal = "Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization",
issn = "0167-2681",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "Supplement",

}

Investor’s choice of Shariah compliant ‘replicas’ and original Islamic instruments. / Azmat, Saad; Jalil, Muhammad Naiman; Skully, Michael Thomas; Brown, Kym Eva.

In: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 132, No. Supplement, 2016, p. 4-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investor’s choice of Shariah compliant ‘replicas’ and original Islamic instruments

AU - Azmat, Saad

AU - Jalil, Muhammad Naiman

AU - Skully, Michael Thomas

AU - Brown, Kym Eva

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This paper offers a behavioral perspective on why Islamic capital markets are dominated by those financial instruments that almost replicate conventional financial products (i.e.Islamic debt bonds and Islamic equities). In contrast, the original Islamic instruments involving risk and return sharing (Musharakah) have failed to emerge. This paper argues that before the replicas, an investor’s choice was simply between Islamic and non-Islamic instruments. Along with risk and return, compliance with Islamic principles or Shariah was an integral part of investor utility. As Shariah standards came to give legitimacy to other financial structures, the investors could then choose between various Islamic replicas and the original Islamic instruments. We argue that once the investor’s intrinsic need for Shariah compliance is fulfilled, an instrument’s risk-return features would become more important.So for loss averse investors with shorter evaluation periods, the loss sharing feature of the Islamic risk and return instruments (Musharkah) makes them less attractive than Islamic debt bonds. For longer evaluation periods, Islamic equities are also shown to out-perform the risk and return (Musharakah) instruments. Using the S&P Islamic bond index for bond data and the Dow Jones Islamic Market World Index for Islamic equities, we confirm these views about investor utility by way of both loss aversion and habit based consumption models. The findings suggest that Islamic debt bonds and Islamic equities have been allowed to jointly crowd out the original Islamic risk and return (Musharakah) instruments.

AB - This paper offers a behavioral perspective on why Islamic capital markets are dominated by those financial instruments that almost replicate conventional financial products (i.e.Islamic debt bonds and Islamic equities). In contrast, the original Islamic instruments involving risk and return sharing (Musharakah) have failed to emerge. This paper argues that before the replicas, an investor’s choice was simply between Islamic and non-Islamic instruments. Along with risk and return, compliance with Islamic principles or Shariah was an integral part of investor utility. As Shariah standards came to give legitimacy to other financial structures, the investors could then choose between various Islamic replicas and the original Islamic instruments. We argue that once the investor’s intrinsic need for Shariah compliance is fulfilled, an instrument’s risk-return features would become more important.So for loss averse investors with shorter evaluation periods, the loss sharing feature of the Islamic risk and return instruments (Musharkah) makes them less attractive than Islamic debt bonds. For longer evaluation periods, Islamic equities are also shown to out-perform the risk and return (Musharakah) instruments. Using the S&P Islamic bond index for bond data and the Dow Jones Islamic Market World Index for Islamic equities, we confirm these views about investor utility by way of both loss aversion and habit based consumption models. The findings suggest that Islamic debt bonds and Islamic equities have been allowed to jointly crowd out the original Islamic risk and return (Musharakah) instruments.

KW - Islamic instrument

KW - investor behavior

U2 - 10.1016/j.jebo.2016.07.018

DO - 10.1016/j.jebo.2016.07.018

M3 - Article

VL - 132

SP - 4

EP - 22

JO - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

JF - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

SN - 0167-2681

IS - Supplement

ER -