TY - JOUR
T1 - Invasive alien insects represent a clear but variable threat to biodiversity
AU - Clarke, David A.
AU - McGeoch, Melodie A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Brent Sinclair and two anonymous reviewers for comments and suggestions that improved the manuscript. We acknowledge financial support from the Invasive Species Council, the Ian Potter Foundation, Monash University, the Australian Department of Agriculture, and the Queensland Department of Environment. DAC acknowledges support from an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) scholarship. DAC and MAM acknowledge support from the ARC SRIEAS Grant SR200100005 Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future. MAM also acknowledges support from an Australian Research Council Discovery Project DP200101680.
Funding Information:
We thank Brent Sinclair and two anonymous reviewers for comments and suggestions that improved the manuscript. We acknowledge financial support from the Invasive Species Council, the Ian Potter Foundation, Monash University, the Australian Department of Agriculture, and the Queensland Department of Environment. DAC acknowledges support from an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) scholarship. DAC and MAM acknowledge support from the ARC SRIEAS Grant SR200100005 Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future. MAM also acknowledges support from an Australian Research Council Discovery Project DP200101680.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Invasive alien insects are an important yet understudied component of the general threat that biological invasions pose to biodiversity. We quantified the breadth and level of this threat by performing environmental impact assessments using a modified version of the Environmental Impact Assessment for Alien Taxa (EICAT) framework. This represents the largest effort to date on quantify the environmental impacts of invasive alien insects. Using a relatively large and taxonomically representative set of insect species that have established non-native populations around the globe, we tested hypotheses on: (1) socioeconomic and (2) taxonomic biases, (3) relationship between range size and impact severity and (4) island susceptibility. Socioeconomic pests had marginally more environmental impact information than non-pests and, as expected, impact information was geographically and taxonomically skewed. Species with larger introduced ranges were more likely, on average, to have the most severe local environmental impacts (i.e. a global maximum impact severity of ‘Major’). The island susceptibility hypothesis found no support, and both island and mainland systems experience similar numbers of high severity impacts. These results demonstrate the high variability, both within and across species, in the ways and extents to which invasive insects impact biodiversity, even within the highest profile invaders. However, the environmental impact knowledge base requires greater taxonomic and geographic coverage, so that hypotheses about invasion impact can be developed towards identifying generalities in the biogeography of invasion impacts.
AB - Invasive alien insects are an important yet understudied component of the general threat that biological invasions pose to biodiversity. We quantified the breadth and level of this threat by performing environmental impact assessments using a modified version of the Environmental Impact Assessment for Alien Taxa (EICAT) framework. This represents the largest effort to date on quantify the environmental impacts of invasive alien insects. Using a relatively large and taxonomically representative set of insect species that have established non-native populations around the globe, we tested hypotheses on: (1) socioeconomic and (2) taxonomic biases, (3) relationship between range size and impact severity and (4) island susceptibility. Socioeconomic pests had marginally more environmental impact information than non-pests and, as expected, impact information was geographically and taxonomically skewed. Species with larger introduced ranges were more likely, on average, to have the most severe local environmental impacts (i.e. a global maximum impact severity of ‘Major’). The island susceptibility hypothesis found no support, and both island and mainland systems experience similar numbers of high severity impacts. These results demonstrate the high variability, both within and across species, in the ways and extents to which invasive insects impact biodiversity, even within the highest profile invaders. However, the environmental impact knowledge base requires greater taxonomic and geographic coverage, so that hypotheses about invasion impact can be developed towards identifying generalities in the biogeography of invasion impacts.
KW - Environmental impacts
KW - Impact assessment
KW - Invasive alien species
KW - Knowledge shortfalls
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166030582&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cris.2023.100065
DO - 10.1016/j.cris.2023.100065
M3 - Article
C2 - 37564301
AN - SCOPUS:85166030582
SN - 2666-5158
VL - 4
JO - Current Research in Insect Science
JF - Current Research in Insect Science
M1 - 100065
ER -