Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists

Research output: Contribution to journalComment / DebateOtherpeer-review

86 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Systematic reviews should be reported completely and accurately so that users can interpret and appraise the review findings appropriately. In this commentary, we describe key features of a major update of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement—PRISMA 2020—and discuss its implications for research synthesis methodologists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-163
Number of pages8
JournalResearch Synthesis Methods
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2022

Keywords

  • checklist
  • meta-analysis
  • reporting
  • systematic review
  • transparency

Cite this