TY - JOUR
T1 - Introduction of an emergency medicine pharmacist-led sepsis alert response system in the emergency department
T2 - A cohort study
AU - Roman, Cristina Petronela
AU - Dooley, Michael
AU - Nevill, Alexandra
AU - Szmidel, Matthew
AU - McGloughlin, Steven
AU - Luckhoff, Carl
AU - Mitra, Biswadev
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine.
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Objective: To determine effects of implementing a sepsis alert response system in the ED that included early intervention by emergency medicine (EM) pharmacists. Methods: A prospective cohort (8 February 2016 to 28 February 2018) of patients after implementation of a sepsis alert response system in an Australian ED was compared to a retrospective cohort (3 January 2015 to 7 February 2016) of patients with sepsis who presented during EM pharmacist working hours and were admitted to the ICU. Results: There were 184 patients, including 80 patients pre- and 104 patients post-implementation. The post-intervention cohort was triaged at a higher acuity, had higher quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores and higher initial lactate measurements. After the intervention, antimicrobial agents were administered to patients within 60 min of presentation more often (21 [26.3%] to 85 [81.7%], P < 0.001). After adjusting for presenting triage category, admission lactate and presenting qSOFA scores, this association remained significant (adjusted odds ratio 9.99; 95% confidence interval 4.7–21.3). Significant improvements were observed for proportion of patients who had intravenous fluids initiated within 60 min (47.5% vs 72.1%); proportion of patients who had serum lactate measured within 60 min (50.0% vs 77.9%) and proportion of patients who had blood cultures performed within 60 min (52.5% vs 85.6%). Conclusion: Implementation of a sepsis alert response that included early involvement of the EM pharmacist was associated with improvement in time to antimicrobials and other components of the sepsis bundle. An upfront, multidisciplinary approach to patients presenting to the ED with suspected sepsis should be considered more broadly.
AB - Objective: To determine effects of implementing a sepsis alert response system in the ED that included early intervention by emergency medicine (EM) pharmacists. Methods: A prospective cohort (8 February 2016 to 28 February 2018) of patients after implementation of a sepsis alert response system in an Australian ED was compared to a retrospective cohort (3 January 2015 to 7 February 2016) of patients with sepsis who presented during EM pharmacist working hours and were admitted to the ICU. Results: There were 184 patients, including 80 patients pre- and 104 patients post-implementation. The post-intervention cohort was triaged at a higher acuity, had higher quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores and higher initial lactate measurements. After the intervention, antimicrobial agents were administered to patients within 60 min of presentation more often (21 [26.3%] to 85 [81.7%], P < 0.001). After adjusting for presenting triage category, admission lactate and presenting qSOFA scores, this association remained significant (adjusted odds ratio 9.99; 95% confidence interval 4.7–21.3). Significant improvements were observed for proportion of patients who had intravenous fluids initiated within 60 min (47.5% vs 72.1%); proportion of patients who had serum lactate measured within 60 min (50.0% vs 77.9%) and proportion of patients who had blood cultures performed within 60 min (52.5% vs 85.6%). Conclusion: Implementation of a sepsis alert response that included early involvement of the EM pharmacist was associated with improvement in time to antimicrobials and other components of the sepsis bundle. An upfront, multidisciplinary approach to patients presenting to the ED with suspected sepsis should be considered more broadly.
KW - medicines management
KW - pharmacists
KW - sepsis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85146331032
U2 - 10.1111/1742-6723.14168
DO - 10.1111/1742-6723.14168
M3 - Article
C2 - 36634917
AN - SCOPUS:85146331032
SN - 1742-6731
VL - 35
SP - 564
EP - 571
JO - EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia
JF - EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia
IS - 4
ER -