TY - JOUR
T1 - Intravenous alteplase for stroke with unknown time of onset guided by advanced imaging
T2 - systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data
AU - Thomalla, Götz
AU - Boutitie, Florent
AU - Ma, Henry
AU - Koga, Masatoshi
AU - Ringleb, Peter
AU - Schwamm, Lee H.
AU - Wu, Ona
AU - Bendszus, Martin
AU - Bladin, Christopher F.
AU - Campbell, Bruce C.V.
AU - Cheng, Bastian
AU - Churilov, Leonid
AU - Ebinger, Martin
AU - Endres, Matthias
AU - Fiebach, Jochen B.
AU - Fukuda-Doi, Mayumi
AU - Inoue, Manabu
AU - Kleinig, Timothy J.
AU - Latour, Lawrence L.
AU - Lemmens, Robin
AU - Levi, Christopher R.
AU - Leys, Didier
AU - Miwa, Kaori
AU - Molina, Carlos A.
AU - Muir, Keith W.
AU - Nighoghossian, Norbert
AU - Parsons, Mark W.
AU - Pedraza, Salvador
AU - Schellinger, Peter D.
AU - Schwab, Stefan
AU - Simonsen, Claus Z.
AU - Song, Shlee S.
AU - Thijs, Vincent
AU - Toni, Danilo
AU - Hsu, Chung Y.
AU - Wahlgren, Nils
AU - Yamamoto, Haruko
AU - Yassi, Nawaf
AU - Yoshimura, Sohei
AU - Warach, Steven
AU - Hacke, Werner
AU - Toyoda, Kazunori
AU - Donnan, Geoffrey A.
AU - Davis, Stephen M.
AU - Gerloff, Christian
AU - on behalf of the Evaluation of unknown Onset Stroke thrombolysis trials (EOS) investigators
N1 - Funding Information:
WAKE-UP was supported by a grant (number 278276) from the EU Seventh Framework programme. EXTEND was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council, an Australian Government organisation and Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. Boehringer Ingelheim provided the study investigational products free of charge. THAWS was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED; 19ek0210091h0003 and 19lk0201094h0001), and the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, and the Mihara Cerebrovascular Disorder Research Promotion Fund. ECASS-4 was an investigator-initiated trial supported by an unrestricted grant from Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany). MR WITNESS was supported by the NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Specialized Program of Transitional Research in Acute Stroke (SPOTRIAS; P50-NS051343) and NINDS Division of Intramural Research, was done in part at the Athinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital, using resources provided by the Center for Functional Neuroimaging Technologies (P41EB015896), a P41 Biotechnology Resource Grant supported by the NIH National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering. Genentech provided alteplase free of charge to the study for distribution to all sites except to the NINDS intramural branch and starting in year 2 provided supplemental site payments to permit expansion to 14 sites.
Funding Information:
WAKE-UP was supported by a grant (number 278276) from the EU Seventh Framework programme. EXTEND was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council, an Australian Government organisation and Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. Boehringer Ingelheim provided the study investigational products free of charge. THAWS was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED; 19ek0210091h0003 and 19lk0201094h0001), and the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, and the Mihara Cerebrovascular Disorder Research Promotion Fund. ECASS-4 was an investigator-initiated trial supported by an unrestricted grant from Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany). MR WITNESS was supported by the NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Specialized Program of Transitional Research in Acute Stroke (SPOTRIAS; P50-NS051343) and NINDS Division of Intramural Research, was done in part at the Athinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital, using resources provided by the Center for Functional Neuroimaging Technologies (P41EB015896), a P41 Biotechnology Resource Grant supported by the NIH National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering. Genentech provided alteplase free of charge to the study for distribution to all sites except to the NINDS intramural branch and starting in year 2 provided supplemental site payments to permit expansion to 14 sites.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/11/14
Y1 - 2020/11/14
N2 - Background: Patients who have had a stroke with unknown time of onset have been previously excluded from thrombolysis. We aimed to establish whether intravenous alteplase is safe and effective in such patients when salvageable tissue has been identified with imaging biomarkers. Methods: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data for trials published before Sept 21, 2020. Randomised trials of intravenous alteplase versus standard of care or placebo in adults with stroke with unknown time of onset with perfusion-diffusion MRI, perfusion CT, or MRI with diffusion weighted imaging-fluid attenuated inversion recovery (DWI-FLAIR) mismatch were eligible. The primary outcome was favourable functional outcome (score of 0–1 on the modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) at 90 days indicating no disability using an unconditional mixed-effect logistic-regression model fitted to estimate the treatment effect. Secondary outcomes were mRS shift towards a better functional outcome and independent outcome (mRS 0–2) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included death, severe disability or death (mRS score 4–6), and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020166903. Findings: Of 249 identified abstracts, four trials met our eligibility criteria for inclusion: WAKE-UP, EXTEND, THAWS, and ECASS-4. The four trials provided individual patient data for 843 individuals, of whom 429 (51%) were assigned to alteplase and 414 (49%) to placebo or standard care. A favourable outcome occurred in 199 (47%) of 420 patients with alteplase and in 160 (39%) of 409 patients among controls (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1·49 [95% CI 1·10–2·03]; p=0·011), with low heterogeneity across studies (I2=27%). Alteplase was associated with a significant shift towards better functional outcome (adjusted common OR 1·38 [95% CI 1·05–1·80]; p=0·019), and a higher odds of independent outcome (adjusted OR 1·50 [1·06–2·12]; p=0·022). In the alteplase group, 90 (21%) patients were severely disabled or died (mRS score 4–6), compared with 102 (25%) patients in the control group (adjusted OR 0·76 [0·52–1·11]; p=0·15). 27 (6%) patients died in the alteplase group and 14 (3%) patients died among controls (adjusted OR 2·06 [1·03–4·09]; p=0·040). The prevalence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was higher in the alteplase group than among controls (11 [3%] vs two [<1%], adjusted OR 5·58 [1·22–25·50]; p=0·024). Interpretation: In patients who have had a stroke with unknown time of onset with a DWI-FLAIR or perfusion mismatch, intravenous alteplase resulted in better functional outcome at 90 days than placebo or standard care. A net benefit was observed for all functional outcomes despite an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage. Although there were more deaths with alteplase than placebo, there were fewer cases of severe disability or death. Funding: None.
AB - Background: Patients who have had a stroke with unknown time of onset have been previously excluded from thrombolysis. We aimed to establish whether intravenous alteplase is safe and effective in such patients when salvageable tissue has been identified with imaging biomarkers. Methods: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data for trials published before Sept 21, 2020. Randomised trials of intravenous alteplase versus standard of care or placebo in adults with stroke with unknown time of onset with perfusion-diffusion MRI, perfusion CT, or MRI with diffusion weighted imaging-fluid attenuated inversion recovery (DWI-FLAIR) mismatch were eligible. The primary outcome was favourable functional outcome (score of 0–1 on the modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) at 90 days indicating no disability using an unconditional mixed-effect logistic-regression model fitted to estimate the treatment effect. Secondary outcomes were mRS shift towards a better functional outcome and independent outcome (mRS 0–2) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included death, severe disability or death (mRS score 4–6), and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020166903. Findings: Of 249 identified abstracts, four trials met our eligibility criteria for inclusion: WAKE-UP, EXTEND, THAWS, and ECASS-4. The four trials provided individual patient data for 843 individuals, of whom 429 (51%) were assigned to alteplase and 414 (49%) to placebo or standard care. A favourable outcome occurred in 199 (47%) of 420 patients with alteplase and in 160 (39%) of 409 patients among controls (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1·49 [95% CI 1·10–2·03]; p=0·011), with low heterogeneity across studies (I2=27%). Alteplase was associated with a significant shift towards better functional outcome (adjusted common OR 1·38 [95% CI 1·05–1·80]; p=0·019), and a higher odds of independent outcome (adjusted OR 1·50 [1·06–2·12]; p=0·022). In the alteplase group, 90 (21%) patients were severely disabled or died (mRS score 4–6), compared with 102 (25%) patients in the control group (adjusted OR 0·76 [0·52–1·11]; p=0·15). 27 (6%) patients died in the alteplase group and 14 (3%) patients died among controls (adjusted OR 2·06 [1·03–4·09]; p=0·040). The prevalence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was higher in the alteplase group than among controls (11 [3%] vs two [<1%], adjusted OR 5·58 [1·22–25·50]; p=0·024). Interpretation: In patients who have had a stroke with unknown time of onset with a DWI-FLAIR or perfusion mismatch, intravenous alteplase resulted in better functional outcome at 90 days than placebo or standard care. A net benefit was observed for all functional outcomes despite an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage. Although there were more deaths with alteplase than placebo, there were fewer cases of severe disability or death. Funding: None.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85095940224
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32163-2
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32163-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 33176180
AN - SCOPUS:85095940224
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 396
SP - 1574
EP - 1584
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 10262
ER -