Intravascular ultrasound guidance improves clinical outcomes during implantation of both first-and secondgeneration drug-eluting stents: A meta-analysis

Nitesh Nerlekar, Caitlin J. Cheshire, Kunal P. Verma, Abdul Rahman Ihdayhid, Liam M. McCormick, James D. Cameron, Martin R. Bennett, Yuvaraj Malaiapan, Ian T. Meredith, Adam J. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: Our aim was to assess whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) improves clinical outcomes during implantation of first-and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). IVUS guidance is associated with improved clinical outcomes during DES implantation, but it is unknown whether this benefit is limited to either first-or second-generation devices. Methods and results: MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed were searched for studies comparing outcomes between IVUS-and angiography-guided PCI. Among 909 potentially relevant studies, 15 trials met the inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was MACE, defined as death, myocardial infarction, target vessel/ lesion revascularisation (TVR/TLR) or stent thrombosis (ST). Summary estimates were obtained using Peto modelling. In total, 9,313 patients from six randomised trials and nine observational studies were included. First-generation DES were implanted in 6,156 patients (3,064 IVUS-guided and 3,092 angiography-guided) and second-generation in 3,157 patients (1,528 IVUS-guided and 1,629 angiography-guided). IVUS guidance was associated with a significant reduction in MACE (odds ratio [OR] 0.73, 95% CI: 0.64-0.85, p<0.001), across both first-(OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.92, p=0.01) and second-generation DES (0.57, 95% CI: 0.43-0.77, p<0.001). For second-generation DES, IVUS guidance was associated with significantly lower rates of cardiac death (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.14-0.78, p=0.02), TVR (OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28-0.79, p=0.006), TLR (OR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.42-0.90, p=0.01) and ST (OR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12-0.78, p=0.02). Cumulative meta-analysis highlighted progressive temporal benefit towards IVUS-guided PCI to reduce MACE (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.48-0.75, p<0.001). Conclusions: IVUS guidance is associated with a significant reduction in MACE during implantation of both first-and second-generation DES platforms. These data support the use of IVUS guidance in contemporary revascularisation procedures using second-generation DES.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1632-1642
Number of pages11
JournalEuroIntervention
Volume12
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Coronary angioplasty
  • Drug-eluting stent
  • Intravascular ultrasound
  • Meta-analysis
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention

Cite this