Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography for the evaluation and management of diastolic dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A survey of current practice

David McIlroy, Enjarn Lin, Stuart Hastings, Chris Durkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives To characterize existing practice patterns for intraoperative evaluation and grading of diastolic dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Design A 14-question, multiple-choice survey of current practice for patients with diastolic dysfunction and the use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to evaluate, grade, and monitor changes in diastolic function. Setting Online survey. Participants Members of the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Interventions None. Measurements and Main Results Of 515 respondents, there was a near-even spread between those based in an academic setting (53%) and those based in private practice (43%). Most respondents (81%) had completed training with certification in TEE. Most respondents (86%) currently modified their intraoperative management, at least some of the time, if they believed a patient was experiencing diastolic dysfunction, with 72% varying the nature of any modification according to the identified grade of diastolic dysfunction. Although 62% of respondents usually evaluated diastolic dysfunction in the pre-bypass period, only 59% of those evaluating diastolic dysfunction typically graded the dysfunction, with a variety of algorithms used for this purpose. The majority of respondents (62%) typically did not re-evaluate diastolic function using TEE in the post-bypass period. In 2 sample patients with Doppler data provided, there was marked variation in grading of diastolic dysfunction by respondents; this variation remained marked even within subgroups of respondents who typically used the same grading algorithm. Conclusions Marked variation currently exists in how intraoperative TEE is used to evaluate, grade, and monitor diastolic function during cardiac surgery. This suggests clinically important knowledge gaps that should be addressed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)389-397
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016

Keywords

  • Cardiac surgery
  • Diastolic Dysfunction
  • Doppler
  • Echocardiography
  • Heart failure
  • Transesophageal echocardiography

Cite this

@article{22a1c1657aae4e18a1f9ea11f8ac84eb,
title = "Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography for the evaluation and management of diastolic dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A survey of current practice",
abstract = "Objectives To characterize existing practice patterns for intraoperative evaluation and grading of diastolic dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Design A 14-question, multiple-choice survey of current practice for patients with diastolic dysfunction and the use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to evaluate, grade, and monitor changes in diastolic function. Setting Online survey. Participants Members of the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Interventions None. Measurements and Main Results Of 515 respondents, there was a near-even spread between those based in an academic setting (53{\%}) and those based in private practice (43{\%}). Most respondents (81{\%}) had completed training with certification in TEE. Most respondents (86{\%}) currently modified their intraoperative management, at least some of the time, if they believed a patient was experiencing diastolic dysfunction, with 72{\%} varying the nature of any modification according to the identified grade of diastolic dysfunction. Although 62{\%} of respondents usually evaluated diastolic dysfunction in the pre-bypass period, only 59{\%} of those evaluating diastolic dysfunction typically graded the dysfunction, with a variety of algorithms used for this purpose. The majority of respondents (62{\%}) typically did not re-evaluate diastolic function using TEE in the post-bypass period. In 2 sample patients with Doppler data provided, there was marked variation in grading of diastolic dysfunction by respondents; this variation remained marked even within subgroups of respondents who typically used the same grading algorithm. Conclusions Marked variation currently exists in how intraoperative TEE is used to evaluate, grade, and monitor diastolic function during cardiac surgery. This suggests clinically important knowledge gaps that should be addressed.",
keywords = "Cardiac surgery, Diastolic Dysfunction, Doppler, Echocardiography, Heart failure, Transesophageal echocardiography",
author = "David McIlroy and Enjarn Lin and Stuart Hastings and Chris Durkin",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/j.jvca.2015.11.002",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "389--397",
journal = "Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia",
issn = "1053-0770",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography for the evaluation and management of diastolic dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

T2 - A survey of current practice

AU - McIlroy, David

AU - Lin, Enjarn

AU - Hastings, Stuart

AU - Durkin, Chris

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Objectives To characterize existing practice patterns for intraoperative evaluation and grading of diastolic dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Design A 14-question, multiple-choice survey of current practice for patients with diastolic dysfunction and the use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to evaluate, grade, and monitor changes in diastolic function. Setting Online survey. Participants Members of the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Interventions None. Measurements and Main Results Of 515 respondents, there was a near-even spread between those based in an academic setting (53%) and those based in private practice (43%). Most respondents (81%) had completed training with certification in TEE. Most respondents (86%) currently modified their intraoperative management, at least some of the time, if they believed a patient was experiencing diastolic dysfunction, with 72% varying the nature of any modification according to the identified grade of diastolic dysfunction. Although 62% of respondents usually evaluated diastolic dysfunction in the pre-bypass period, only 59% of those evaluating diastolic dysfunction typically graded the dysfunction, with a variety of algorithms used for this purpose. The majority of respondents (62%) typically did not re-evaluate diastolic function using TEE in the post-bypass period. In 2 sample patients with Doppler data provided, there was marked variation in grading of diastolic dysfunction by respondents; this variation remained marked even within subgroups of respondents who typically used the same grading algorithm. Conclusions Marked variation currently exists in how intraoperative TEE is used to evaluate, grade, and monitor diastolic function during cardiac surgery. This suggests clinically important knowledge gaps that should be addressed.

AB - Objectives To characterize existing practice patterns for intraoperative evaluation and grading of diastolic dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Design A 14-question, multiple-choice survey of current practice for patients with diastolic dysfunction and the use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to evaluate, grade, and monitor changes in diastolic function. Setting Online survey. Participants Members of the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Interventions None. Measurements and Main Results Of 515 respondents, there was a near-even spread between those based in an academic setting (53%) and those based in private practice (43%). Most respondents (81%) had completed training with certification in TEE. Most respondents (86%) currently modified their intraoperative management, at least some of the time, if they believed a patient was experiencing diastolic dysfunction, with 72% varying the nature of any modification according to the identified grade of diastolic dysfunction. Although 62% of respondents usually evaluated diastolic dysfunction in the pre-bypass period, only 59% of those evaluating diastolic dysfunction typically graded the dysfunction, with a variety of algorithms used for this purpose. The majority of respondents (62%) typically did not re-evaluate diastolic function using TEE in the post-bypass period. In 2 sample patients with Doppler data provided, there was marked variation in grading of diastolic dysfunction by respondents; this variation remained marked even within subgroups of respondents who typically used the same grading algorithm. Conclusions Marked variation currently exists in how intraoperative TEE is used to evaluate, grade, and monitor diastolic function during cardiac surgery. This suggests clinically important knowledge gaps that should be addressed.

KW - Cardiac surgery

KW - Diastolic Dysfunction

KW - Doppler

KW - Echocardiography

KW - Heart failure

KW - Transesophageal echocardiography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955301826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.11.002

DO - 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.11.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84955301826

VL - 30

SP - 389

EP - 397

JO - Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

SN - 1053-0770

IS - 2

ER -