Intra-operative protective mechanical ventilation in lung transplantation: a randomised, controlled trial

G L Verbeek, P S Myles, G. P. Westall, E Lin, S. L. Hastings, S. F. Marasco, J. Jaffar, A C Meehan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Primary graft dysfunction occurs in up to 25% of patients after lung transplantation. Contributing factors include ventilator-induced lung injury, cardiopulmonary bypass, ischaemia-reperfusion injury and excessive fluid administration. We evaluated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of an open-lung protective ventilation strategy aimed at reducing ventilator-induced lung injury. We enrolled adult patients scheduled to undergo bilateral sequential lung transplantation, and randomly assigned them to either a control group (volume-controlled ventilation with 5 cmH2O, positive end-expiratory pressure, low tidal volumes (two-lung ventilation 6 ml.kg−1, one-lung ventilation 4 ml.kg−1)) or an alveolar recruitment group (regular step-wise positive end-expiratory pressure-based alveolar recruitment manoeuvres, pressure-controlled ventilation set at 16 cmH2O with 10 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure). Ventilation strategies were commenced from reperfusion of the first lung allograft and continued for the duration of surgery. Regular PaO2/FIO2 ratios were calculated and venous blood samples collected for inflammatory marker evaluation during the procedure and for the first 24 h of intensive care stay. The primary end-point was the PaO2/FIO2 ratio at 24 h after first lung reperfusion. Thirty adult patients were studied. The primary outcome was not different between groups (mean (SD) PaO2/FIO2 ratio control group 340 (111) vs. alveolar recruitment group 404 (153); adjusted p = 0.26). Patients in the control group had poorer mean (SD) PaO2/FIO2 ratios at the end of the surgical procedure and a longer median (IQR [range]) time to tracheal extubation compared with the alveolar recruitment group (308 (144) vs. 402 (154) (p = 0.03) and 18 (10–27 [5–468]) h vs. 15 (11–36 [5–115]) h (p = 0.01), respectively). An open-lung protective ventilation strategy during surgery for lung transplantation is feasible, safe and achieves favourable ventilation parameters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)993-1004
Number of pages12
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume72
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2017

Keywords

  • lung protection ventilation
  • lungs: management
  • organ donor
  • ventilator: low tidal volume

Cite this

@article{1cf75f47a9794caba2adf64c9db2b45b,
title = "Intra-operative protective mechanical ventilation in lung transplantation: a randomised, controlled trial",
abstract = "Primary graft dysfunction occurs in up to 25{\%} of patients after lung transplantation. Contributing factors include ventilator-induced lung injury, cardiopulmonary bypass, ischaemia-reperfusion injury and excessive fluid administration. We evaluated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of an open-lung protective ventilation strategy aimed at reducing ventilator-induced lung injury. We enrolled adult patients scheduled to undergo bilateral sequential lung transplantation, and randomly assigned them to either a control group (volume-controlled ventilation with 5 cmH2O, positive end-expiratory pressure, low tidal volumes (two-lung ventilation 6 ml.kg−1, one-lung ventilation 4 ml.kg−1)) or an alveolar recruitment group (regular step-wise positive end-expiratory pressure-based alveolar recruitment manoeuvres, pressure-controlled ventilation set at 16 cmH2O with 10 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure). Ventilation strategies were commenced from reperfusion of the first lung allograft and continued for the duration of surgery. Regular PaO2/FIO2 ratios were calculated and venous blood samples collected for inflammatory marker evaluation during the procedure and for the first 24 h of intensive care stay. The primary end-point was the PaO2/FIO2 ratio at 24 h after first lung reperfusion. Thirty adult patients were studied. The primary outcome was not different between groups (mean (SD) PaO2/FIO2 ratio control group 340 (111) vs. alveolar recruitment group 404 (153); adjusted p = 0.26). Patients in the control group had poorer mean (SD) PaO2/FIO2 ratios at the end of the surgical procedure and a longer median (IQR [range]) time to tracheal extubation compared with the alveolar recruitment group (308 (144) vs. 402 (154) (p = 0.03) and 18 (10–27 [5–468]) h vs. 15 (11–36 [5–115]) h (p = 0.01), respectively). An open-lung protective ventilation strategy during surgery for lung transplantation is feasible, safe and achieves favourable ventilation parameters.",
keywords = "lung protection ventilation, lungs: management, organ donor, ventilator: low tidal volume",
author = "Verbeek, {G L} and Myles, {P S} and Westall, {G. P.} and E Lin and Hastings, {S. L.} and Marasco, {S. F.} and J. Jaffar and Meehan, {A C}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/anae.13964",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "993--1004",
journal = "Anaesthesia",
issn = "0003-2409",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

Intra-operative protective mechanical ventilation in lung transplantation : a randomised, controlled trial. / Verbeek, G L; Myles, P S; Westall, G. P.; Lin, E; Hastings, S. L.; Marasco, S. F.; Jaffar, J.; Meehan, A C.

In: Anaesthesia, Vol. 72, No. 8, 01.08.2017, p. 993-1004.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intra-operative protective mechanical ventilation in lung transplantation

T2 - a randomised, controlled trial

AU - Verbeek, G L

AU - Myles, P S

AU - Westall, G. P.

AU - Lin, E

AU - Hastings, S. L.

AU - Marasco, S. F.

AU - Jaffar, J.

AU - Meehan, A C

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Primary graft dysfunction occurs in up to 25% of patients after lung transplantation. Contributing factors include ventilator-induced lung injury, cardiopulmonary bypass, ischaemia-reperfusion injury and excessive fluid administration. We evaluated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of an open-lung protective ventilation strategy aimed at reducing ventilator-induced lung injury. We enrolled adult patients scheduled to undergo bilateral sequential lung transplantation, and randomly assigned them to either a control group (volume-controlled ventilation with 5 cmH2O, positive end-expiratory pressure, low tidal volumes (two-lung ventilation 6 ml.kg−1, one-lung ventilation 4 ml.kg−1)) or an alveolar recruitment group (regular step-wise positive end-expiratory pressure-based alveolar recruitment manoeuvres, pressure-controlled ventilation set at 16 cmH2O with 10 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure). Ventilation strategies were commenced from reperfusion of the first lung allograft and continued for the duration of surgery. Regular PaO2/FIO2 ratios were calculated and venous blood samples collected for inflammatory marker evaluation during the procedure and for the first 24 h of intensive care stay. The primary end-point was the PaO2/FIO2 ratio at 24 h after first lung reperfusion. Thirty adult patients were studied. The primary outcome was not different between groups (mean (SD) PaO2/FIO2 ratio control group 340 (111) vs. alveolar recruitment group 404 (153); adjusted p = 0.26). Patients in the control group had poorer mean (SD) PaO2/FIO2 ratios at the end of the surgical procedure and a longer median (IQR [range]) time to tracheal extubation compared with the alveolar recruitment group (308 (144) vs. 402 (154) (p = 0.03) and 18 (10–27 [5–468]) h vs. 15 (11–36 [5–115]) h (p = 0.01), respectively). An open-lung protective ventilation strategy during surgery for lung transplantation is feasible, safe and achieves favourable ventilation parameters.

AB - Primary graft dysfunction occurs in up to 25% of patients after lung transplantation. Contributing factors include ventilator-induced lung injury, cardiopulmonary bypass, ischaemia-reperfusion injury and excessive fluid administration. We evaluated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of an open-lung protective ventilation strategy aimed at reducing ventilator-induced lung injury. We enrolled adult patients scheduled to undergo bilateral sequential lung transplantation, and randomly assigned them to either a control group (volume-controlled ventilation with 5 cmH2O, positive end-expiratory pressure, low tidal volumes (two-lung ventilation 6 ml.kg−1, one-lung ventilation 4 ml.kg−1)) or an alveolar recruitment group (regular step-wise positive end-expiratory pressure-based alveolar recruitment manoeuvres, pressure-controlled ventilation set at 16 cmH2O with 10 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure). Ventilation strategies were commenced from reperfusion of the first lung allograft and continued for the duration of surgery. Regular PaO2/FIO2 ratios were calculated and venous blood samples collected for inflammatory marker evaluation during the procedure and for the first 24 h of intensive care stay. The primary end-point was the PaO2/FIO2 ratio at 24 h after first lung reperfusion. Thirty adult patients were studied. The primary outcome was not different between groups (mean (SD) PaO2/FIO2 ratio control group 340 (111) vs. alveolar recruitment group 404 (153); adjusted p = 0.26). Patients in the control group had poorer mean (SD) PaO2/FIO2 ratios at the end of the surgical procedure and a longer median (IQR [range]) time to tracheal extubation compared with the alveolar recruitment group (308 (144) vs. 402 (154) (p = 0.03) and 18 (10–27 [5–468]) h vs. 15 (11–36 [5–115]) h (p = 0.01), respectively). An open-lung protective ventilation strategy during surgery for lung transplantation is feasible, safe and achieves favourable ventilation parameters.

KW - lung protection ventilation

KW - lungs: management

KW - organ donor

KW - ventilator: low tidal volume

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85022231308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/anae.13964

DO - 10.1111/anae.13964

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 993

EP - 1004

JO - Anaesthesia

JF - Anaesthesia

SN - 0003-2409

IS - 8

ER -