Intra- and international risk-sharing in the short run and the long run

Sascha O. Becker, Mathias Hoffmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigate empirically how industrialized countries and US states share consumption risk at horizons between 1 and 30 years. US federal states share about 50% of their permanent idiosyncratic risk through cross-state capital income flows. While insurance against transitory fluctuations in output is virtually complete, OECD countries do not share any of their permanent idiosyncratic risk. Our results suggest that purely transaction cost based theories cannot explain the home bias, since the potential welfare gains from insurance against permanent shocks would by far outweigh that of insuring against transitory variation. We conclude that permanent and transitory shocks constitute two qualitatively different kinds of risk and that various forms of endogenous market incompleteness may render permanent shocks a lot harder to insure, in particular at the international level.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)777-806
Number of pages30
JournalEuropean Economic Review
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Consumption risk sharing
  • Home bias
  • International business cycles
  • Panel vector autoregressions

Cite this

@article{746ae325125149a49fab1f1f913062b4,
title = "Intra- and international risk-sharing in the short run and the long run",
abstract = "We investigate empirically how industrialized countries and US states share consumption risk at horizons between 1 and 30 years. US federal states share about 50{\%} of their permanent idiosyncratic risk through cross-state capital income flows. While insurance against transitory fluctuations in output is virtually complete, OECD countries do not share any of their permanent idiosyncratic risk. Our results suggest that purely transaction cost based theories cannot explain the home bias, since the potential welfare gains from insurance against permanent shocks would by far outweigh that of insuring against transitory variation. We conclude that permanent and transitory shocks constitute two qualitatively different kinds of risk and that various forms of endogenous market incompleteness may render permanent shocks a lot harder to insure, in particular at the international level.",
keywords = "Consumption risk sharing, Home bias, International business cycles, Panel vector autoregressions",
author = "Becker, {Sascha O.} and Mathias Hoffmann",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.11.003",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "777--806",
journal = "European Economic Review",
issn = "0014-2921",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Intra- and international risk-sharing in the short run and the long run. / Becker, Sascha O.; Hoffmann, Mathias.

In: European Economic Review, Vol. 50, No. 3, 04.2006, p. 777-806.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intra- and international risk-sharing in the short run and the long run

AU - Becker, Sascha O.

AU - Hoffmann, Mathias

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - We investigate empirically how industrialized countries and US states share consumption risk at horizons between 1 and 30 years. US federal states share about 50% of their permanent idiosyncratic risk through cross-state capital income flows. While insurance against transitory fluctuations in output is virtually complete, OECD countries do not share any of their permanent idiosyncratic risk. Our results suggest that purely transaction cost based theories cannot explain the home bias, since the potential welfare gains from insurance against permanent shocks would by far outweigh that of insuring against transitory variation. We conclude that permanent and transitory shocks constitute two qualitatively different kinds of risk and that various forms of endogenous market incompleteness may render permanent shocks a lot harder to insure, in particular at the international level.

AB - We investigate empirically how industrialized countries and US states share consumption risk at horizons between 1 and 30 years. US federal states share about 50% of their permanent idiosyncratic risk through cross-state capital income flows. While insurance against transitory fluctuations in output is virtually complete, OECD countries do not share any of their permanent idiosyncratic risk. Our results suggest that purely transaction cost based theories cannot explain the home bias, since the potential welfare gains from insurance against permanent shocks would by far outweigh that of insuring against transitory variation. We conclude that permanent and transitory shocks constitute two qualitatively different kinds of risk and that various forms of endogenous market incompleteness may render permanent shocks a lot harder to insure, in particular at the international level.

KW - Consumption risk sharing

KW - Home bias

KW - International business cycles

KW - Panel vector autoregressions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645146037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.11.003

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 777

EP - 806

JO - European Economic Review

JF - European Economic Review

SN - 0014-2921

IS - 3

ER -