TY - JOUR
T1 - Interventions that Address Institutional Child Maltreatment
T2 - An Evidence and Gap Map
AU - Finch, Meghan
AU - Featherston, Rebecca
AU - Chakraborty, Sangita
AU - Bjørndal, Ludvig
AU - Mildon, Robyn
AU - Albers, Bianca
AU - Fiennes, Caroline
AU - Taylor, David J.A.
AU - Schachtman, Rebecca
AU - Yang, Taoran
AU - Shlonsky, Aron
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This EGM was funded by Porticus, an international organisation managing and developing the philanthropic programmes of charitable entities established by Brenninkmeijer family entrepreneurs.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Purpose: This evidence and gap map collates evidence reporting on the effectiveness of interventions aimed to prevent, disclose, respond to, or treat child maltreatment occurring in institutional settings. Methods: A comprehensive and systematic literature search identified primary studies and systematic reviews meeting the review’s eligibility criteria. Literature screening, data extraction and critical appraisals were undertaken independently by multiple reviewers. Data extracted and reported from the included studies included information about the institutional setting, target population, type of maltreatment, intervention type and outcomes. Results: Seventy-three studies were identified, including 11 systematic reviews and 62 primary studies. Overall, the methodological quality of the studies was low to moderate. Most evaluated curriculum-based interventions delivered in educational settings, primarily aimed at preventing sexual abuse. Fewer studies examined other institutional settings or intervention types. Conclusions: This review highlights a need for high-quality studies evaluating a more diverse range of interventions across more varied institutional contexts.
AB - Purpose: This evidence and gap map collates evidence reporting on the effectiveness of interventions aimed to prevent, disclose, respond to, or treat child maltreatment occurring in institutional settings. Methods: A comprehensive and systematic literature search identified primary studies and systematic reviews meeting the review’s eligibility criteria. Literature screening, data extraction and critical appraisals were undertaken independently by multiple reviewers. Data extracted and reported from the included studies included information about the institutional setting, target population, type of maltreatment, intervention type and outcomes. Results: Seventy-three studies were identified, including 11 systematic reviews and 62 primary studies. Overall, the methodological quality of the studies was low to moderate. Most evaluated curriculum-based interventions delivered in educational settings, primarily aimed at preventing sexual abuse. Fewer studies examined other institutional settings or intervention types. Conclusions: This review highlights a need for high-quality studies evaluating a more diverse range of interventions across more varied institutional contexts.
KW - child abuse
KW - child maltreatment
KW - evidence gap map
KW - intervention
KW - sexual abuse
KW - systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135466508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/10497315221115867
DO - 10.1177/10497315221115867
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85135466508
SN - 1049-7315
VL - 33
SP - 437
EP - 459
JO - Research on Social Work Practice
JF - Research on Social Work Practice
IS - 4
ER -