Interval between IVF stimulation cycle and frozen embryo transfer

Is there a benefit to a delay between cycles?

Chloe Higgins, Martin Healey, Sameer Jatkar, Beverley Vollenhoven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: There is currently limited evidence available regarding ideal timing for frozen embryo transfer (FET). Demonstrating that delaying FETs has few clinical benefits would allow patients to proceed with FET at their earliest convenience. Aims: To examine whether the time interval between stimulation cycle and subsequent FET affects pregnancy and live birth rates. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study, based in a multi-site private in vitro fertilisation (IVF) clinic categorised women into two groups: those having FET cycles administered within 25-35 days or 50-70 days of IVF stimulation cycle and embryo freeze. Outcomes measured were clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Results: When comparing the patients who have had a 25-35 days gap between embryo freeze and FET, to the matched patients who had a 50-70 days gap, the statistically significant results showed an adjusted odds ratio for live birth of 1.31 (1.02-1.67). The adjusted odds ratio for clinical pregnancy in matched case: control analysis was not statistically significant at 1.22 (0.97-1.53). Conclusion: A gap of 25-35 days between embryo freeze and FET was associated with improved live birth rates compared to a gap of 50-70 days.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-221
Number of pages5
JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018

Keywords

  • Clinical pregnancy
  • Embryo cryopreservation
  • Frozen embryo transfer
  • Live birth
  • Time to pregnancy

Cite this

@article{c2602936d5fa4d58916bf282f0a659cf,
title = "Interval between IVF stimulation cycle and frozen embryo transfer: Is there a benefit to a delay between cycles?",
abstract = "Background: There is currently limited evidence available regarding ideal timing for frozen embryo transfer (FET). Demonstrating that delaying FETs has few clinical benefits would allow patients to proceed with FET at their earliest convenience. Aims: To examine whether the time interval between stimulation cycle and subsequent FET affects pregnancy and live birth rates. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study, based in a multi-site private in vitro fertilisation (IVF) clinic categorised women into two groups: those having FET cycles administered within 25-35 days or 50-70 days of IVF stimulation cycle and embryo freeze. Outcomes measured were clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Results: When comparing the patients who have had a 25-35 days gap between embryo freeze and FET, to the matched patients who had a 50-70 days gap, the statistically significant results showed an adjusted odds ratio for live birth of 1.31 (1.02-1.67). The adjusted odds ratio for clinical pregnancy in matched case: control analysis was not statistically significant at 1.22 (0.97-1.53). Conclusion: A gap of 25-35 days between embryo freeze and FET was associated with improved live birth rates compared to a gap of 50-70 days.",
keywords = "Clinical pregnancy, Embryo cryopreservation, Frozen embryo transfer, Live birth, Time to pregnancy",
author = "Chloe Higgins and Martin Healey and Sameer Jatkar and Beverley Vollenhoven",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/ajo.12696",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "217--221",
journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "0004-8666",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Interval between IVF stimulation cycle and frozen embryo transfer : Is there a benefit to a delay between cycles? / Higgins, Chloe; Healey, Martin; Jatkar, Sameer; Vollenhoven, Beverley.

In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 58, No. 2, 04.2018, p. 217-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interval between IVF stimulation cycle and frozen embryo transfer

T2 - Is there a benefit to a delay between cycles?

AU - Higgins, Chloe

AU - Healey, Martin

AU - Jatkar, Sameer

AU - Vollenhoven, Beverley

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - Background: There is currently limited evidence available regarding ideal timing for frozen embryo transfer (FET). Demonstrating that delaying FETs has few clinical benefits would allow patients to proceed with FET at their earliest convenience. Aims: To examine whether the time interval between stimulation cycle and subsequent FET affects pregnancy and live birth rates. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study, based in a multi-site private in vitro fertilisation (IVF) clinic categorised women into two groups: those having FET cycles administered within 25-35 days or 50-70 days of IVF stimulation cycle and embryo freeze. Outcomes measured were clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Results: When comparing the patients who have had a 25-35 days gap between embryo freeze and FET, to the matched patients who had a 50-70 days gap, the statistically significant results showed an adjusted odds ratio for live birth of 1.31 (1.02-1.67). The adjusted odds ratio for clinical pregnancy in matched case: control analysis was not statistically significant at 1.22 (0.97-1.53). Conclusion: A gap of 25-35 days between embryo freeze and FET was associated with improved live birth rates compared to a gap of 50-70 days.

AB - Background: There is currently limited evidence available regarding ideal timing for frozen embryo transfer (FET). Demonstrating that delaying FETs has few clinical benefits would allow patients to proceed with FET at their earliest convenience. Aims: To examine whether the time interval between stimulation cycle and subsequent FET affects pregnancy and live birth rates. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study, based in a multi-site private in vitro fertilisation (IVF) clinic categorised women into two groups: those having FET cycles administered within 25-35 days or 50-70 days of IVF stimulation cycle and embryo freeze. Outcomes measured were clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Results: When comparing the patients who have had a 25-35 days gap between embryo freeze and FET, to the matched patients who had a 50-70 days gap, the statistically significant results showed an adjusted odds ratio for live birth of 1.31 (1.02-1.67). The adjusted odds ratio for clinical pregnancy in matched case: control analysis was not statistically significant at 1.22 (0.97-1.53). Conclusion: A gap of 25-35 days between embryo freeze and FET was associated with improved live birth rates compared to a gap of 50-70 days.

KW - Clinical pregnancy

KW - Embryo cryopreservation

KW - Frozen embryo transfer

KW - Live birth

KW - Time to pregnancy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029369468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ajo.12696

DO - 10.1111/ajo.12696

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 217

EP - 221

JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 0004-8666

IS - 2

ER -