Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners

Evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries

Mark Fort Harris, Jenny Rose Advocat, Benjamin Crabtree, Jean-Frederic Levesque, William L Miller, Jane Maree Gunn, William Hogg, Catherine Scott, Sabrina M Chase, Lisa Halma, Grant Mervyn Russell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: A key aim of reforms to primary health care (PHC) in many countries has been to enhance interprofessional teamwork. However, the impact of these changes on practitioners has not been well understood.

Objective: To assess the impact of reform policies and interventions that have aimed to create or enhance teamwork on professional communication relationships, roles, and work satisfaction in PHC practices.

Design: Collaborative synthesis of 12 mixed methods studies.

Setting: Primary care practices undergoing transformational change in three countries: Australia, Canada, and the USA, including three Canadian provinces (Alberta, Ontario, and Quebec).

Methods: We conducted a synthesis and secondary analysis of 12 qualitative and quantitative studies conducted by the authors in order to understand the impacts and how they were influenced by local context.

Results: There was a diverse range of complex reforms seeking to foster interprofessional teamwork in the care of patients with chronic disease. The impact on communication and relationships between different professional groups, the roles of nursing and allied health services, and the expressed satisfaction of PHC providers with their work varied more within than between jurisdictions. These variations were associated with local contextual factors such as the size, power dynamics, leadership, and physical environment of the practice. Unintended consequences included deterioration of the work satisfaction of some team members and conflict between medical and nonmedical professional groups.

Conclusion: The variation in impacts can be understood to have arisen from the complexity of interprofessional dynamics at the practice level. The same characteristic could have both positive and negative influence on different aspects (eg, larger practice may have less capacity for adoption but more capacity to support interprofessional practice). Thus, the impacts are not entirely predictable and need to be monitored, and so that interventions can be adapted at the local level.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35 - 46
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Interprofessional care
  • Primary health care
  • Teamwork
  • Research synthesis

Cite this

Harris, Mark Fort ; Advocat, Jenny Rose ; Crabtree, Benjamin ; Levesque, Jean-Frederic ; Miller, William L ; Gunn, Jane Maree ; Hogg, William ; Scott, Catherine ; Chase, Sabrina M ; Halma, Lisa ; Russell, Grant Mervyn. / Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners : Evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries. In: Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2016 ; Vol. 9. pp. 35 - 46.
@article{57bbefa8c4b149069b9ac325f45db314,
title = "Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners: Evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries",
abstract = "Context: A key aim of reforms to primary health care (PHC) in many countries has been to enhance interprofessional teamwork. However, the impact of these changes on practitioners has not been well understood.Objective: To assess the impact of reform policies and interventions that have aimed to create or enhance teamwork on professional communication relationships, roles, and work satisfaction in PHC practices.Design: Collaborative synthesis of 12 mixed methods studies.Setting: Primary care practices undergoing transformational change in three countries: Australia, Canada, and the USA, including three Canadian provinces (Alberta, Ontario, and Quebec).Methods: We conducted a synthesis and secondary analysis of 12 qualitative and quantitative studies conducted by the authors in order to understand the impacts and how they were influenced by local context.Results: There was a diverse range of complex reforms seeking to foster interprofessional teamwork in the care of patients with chronic disease. The impact on communication and relationships between different professional groups, the roles of nursing and allied health services, and the expressed satisfaction of PHC providers with their work varied more within than between jurisdictions. These variations were associated with local contextual factors such as the size, power dynamics, leadership, and physical environment of the practice. Unintended consequences included deterioration of the work satisfaction of some team members and conflict between medical and nonmedical professional groups.Conclusion: The variation in impacts can be understood to have arisen from the complexity of interprofessional dynamics at the practice level. The same characteristic could have both positive and negative influence on different aspects (eg, larger practice may have less capacity for adoption but more capacity to support interprofessional practice). Thus, the impacts are not entirely predictable and need to be monitored, and so that interventions can be adapted at the local level.",
keywords = "Interprofessional care, Primary health care, Teamwork, Research synthesis",
author = "Harris, {Mark Fort} and Advocat, {Jenny Rose} and Benjamin Crabtree and Jean-Frederic Levesque and Miller, {William L} and Gunn, {Jane Maree} and William Hogg and Catherine Scott and Chase, {Sabrina M} and Lisa Halma and Russell, {Grant Mervyn}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.2147/JMDH.S97371",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "35 -- 46",
journal = "Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare",
issn = "1178-2390",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd.",

}

Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners : Evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries. / Harris, Mark Fort; Advocat, Jenny Rose; Crabtree, Benjamin; Levesque, Jean-Frederic; Miller, William L; Gunn, Jane Maree; Hogg, William; Scott, Catherine; Chase, Sabrina M; Halma, Lisa; Russell, Grant Mervyn.

In: Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, Vol. 9, 2016, p. 35 - 46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners

T2 - Evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries

AU - Harris, Mark Fort

AU - Advocat, Jenny Rose

AU - Crabtree, Benjamin

AU - Levesque, Jean-Frederic

AU - Miller, William L

AU - Gunn, Jane Maree

AU - Hogg, William

AU - Scott, Catherine

AU - Chase, Sabrina M

AU - Halma, Lisa

AU - Russell, Grant Mervyn

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Context: A key aim of reforms to primary health care (PHC) in many countries has been to enhance interprofessional teamwork. However, the impact of these changes on practitioners has not been well understood.Objective: To assess the impact of reform policies and interventions that have aimed to create or enhance teamwork on professional communication relationships, roles, and work satisfaction in PHC practices.Design: Collaborative synthesis of 12 mixed methods studies.Setting: Primary care practices undergoing transformational change in three countries: Australia, Canada, and the USA, including three Canadian provinces (Alberta, Ontario, and Quebec).Methods: We conducted a synthesis and secondary analysis of 12 qualitative and quantitative studies conducted by the authors in order to understand the impacts and how they were influenced by local context.Results: There was a diverse range of complex reforms seeking to foster interprofessional teamwork in the care of patients with chronic disease. The impact on communication and relationships between different professional groups, the roles of nursing and allied health services, and the expressed satisfaction of PHC providers with their work varied more within than between jurisdictions. These variations were associated with local contextual factors such as the size, power dynamics, leadership, and physical environment of the practice. Unintended consequences included deterioration of the work satisfaction of some team members and conflict between medical and nonmedical professional groups.Conclusion: The variation in impacts can be understood to have arisen from the complexity of interprofessional dynamics at the practice level. The same characteristic could have both positive and negative influence on different aspects (eg, larger practice may have less capacity for adoption but more capacity to support interprofessional practice). Thus, the impacts are not entirely predictable and need to be monitored, and so that interventions can be adapted at the local level.

AB - Context: A key aim of reforms to primary health care (PHC) in many countries has been to enhance interprofessional teamwork. However, the impact of these changes on practitioners has not been well understood.Objective: To assess the impact of reform policies and interventions that have aimed to create or enhance teamwork on professional communication relationships, roles, and work satisfaction in PHC practices.Design: Collaborative synthesis of 12 mixed methods studies.Setting: Primary care practices undergoing transformational change in three countries: Australia, Canada, and the USA, including three Canadian provinces (Alberta, Ontario, and Quebec).Methods: We conducted a synthesis and secondary analysis of 12 qualitative and quantitative studies conducted by the authors in order to understand the impacts and how they were influenced by local context.Results: There was a diverse range of complex reforms seeking to foster interprofessional teamwork in the care of patients with chronic disease. The impact on communication and relationships between different professional groups, the roles of nursing and allied health services, and the expressed satisfaction of PHC providers with their work varied more within than between jurisdictions. These variations were associated with local contextual factors such as the size, power dynamics, leadership, and physical environment of the practice. Unintended consequences included deterioration of the work satisfaction of some team members and conflict between medical and nonmedical professional groups.Conclusion: The variation in impacts can be understood to have arisen from the complexity of interprofessional dynamics at the practice level. The same characteristic could have both positive and negative influence on different aspects (eg, larger practice may have less capacity for adoption but more capacity to support interprofessional practice). Thus, the impacts are not entirely predictable and need to be monitored, and so that interventions can be adapted at the local level.

KW - Interprofessional care

KW - Primary health care

KW - Teamwork

KW - Research synthesis

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4743635/pdf/jmdh-9-035.pdf

U2 - 10.2147/JMDH.S97371

DO - 10.2147/JMDH.S97371

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 35

EP - 46

JO - Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare

JF - Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare

SN - 1178-2390

ER -