Interpreting Constitutions

A Comparative Study

Research output: Book/ReportBookResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This book describes the constitutions of six major federations and how they have been interpreted by their highest courts, compares the interpretive methods and underlying principles that have guided the courts, and explores the reasons for major differences between these methods and principles. Among the interpretive methods discussed are textualism, purposivism, structuralism, and originalism. Each of the six federations is the subject of a separate chapter written by an authority in the field: Australia, Canada, Germany, India, South Africa, and the United States. Each chapter describes not only the interpretive methodology currently used by the courts, but the evolution of that methodology since the constitution was first enacted. The book also includes a concluding chapter which compares these methodologies, and attempts to explain variations by reference to different social, historical, institutional, and political circumstances.

Original languageEnglish
PublisherOxford University Press, USA
Number of pages384
ISBN (Electronic)9780191706707
ISBN (Print)9780199226474
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2010

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Canada
  • Constitutions
  • Germany
  • India
  • Purposivism
  • South africa
  • Structuralism
  • Textualism
  • United states

Cite this

Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. / Interpreting Constitutions : A Comparative Study. Oxford University Press, USA, 2010. 384 p.
@book{3c64f4854dd04603833ee6be39f39332,
title = "Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative Study",
abstract = "This book describes the constitutions of six major federations and how they have been interpreted by their highest courts, compares the interpretive methods and underlying principles that have guided the courts, and explores the reasons for major differences between these methods and principles. Among the interpretive methods discussed are textualism, purposivism, structuralism, and originalism. Each of the six federations is the subject of a separate chapter written by an authority in the field: Australia, Canada, Germany, India, South Africa, and the United States. Each chapter describes not only the interpretive methodology currently used by the courts, but the evolution of that methodology since the constitution was first enacted. The book also includes a concluding chapter which compares these methodologies, and attempts to explain variations by reference to different social, historical, institutional, and political circumstances.",
keywords = "Australia, Canada, Constitutions, Germany, India, Purposivism, South africa, Structuralism, Textualism, United states",
author = "Jeffrey Goldsworthy",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226474.001.0001",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780199226474",
publisher = "Oxford University Press, USA",

}

Interpreting Constitutions : A Comparative Study. / Goldsworthy, Jeffrey.

Oxford University Press, USA, 2010. 384 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBookResearchpeer-review

TY - BOOK

T1 - Interpreting Constitutions

T2 - A Comparative Study

AU - Goldsworthy, Jeffrey

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - This book describes the constitutions of six major federations and how they have been interpreted by their highest courts, compares the interpretive methods and underlying principles that have guided the courts, and explores the reasons for major differences between these methods and principles. Among the interpretive methods discussed are textualism, purposivism, structuralism, and originalism. Each of the six federations is the subject of a separate chapter written by an authority in the field: Australia, Canada, Germany, India, South Africa, and the United States. Each chapter describes not only the interpretive methodology currently used by the courts, but the evolution of that methodology since the constitution was first enacted. The book also includes a concluding chapter which compares these methodologies, and attempts to explain variations by reference to different social, historical, institutional, and political circumstances.

AB - This book describes the constitutions of six major federations and how they have been interpreted by their highest courts, compares the interpretive methods and underlying principles that have guided the courts, and explores the reasons for major differences between these methods and principles. Among the interpretive methods discussed are textualism, purposivism, structuralism, and originalism. Each of the six federations is the subject of a separate chapter written by an authority in the field: Australia, Canada, Germany, India, South Africa, and the United States. Each chapter describes not only the interpretive methodology currently used by the courts, but the evolution of that methodology since the constitution was first enacted. The book also includes a concluding chapter which compares these methodologies, and attempts to explain variations by reference to different social, historical, institutional, and political circumstances.

KW - Australia

KW - Canada

KW - Constitutions

KW - Germany

KW - India

KW - Purposivism

KW - South africa

KW - Structuralism

KW - Textualism

KW - United states

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919546591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226474.001.0001

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226474.001.0001

M3 - Book

SN - 9780199226474

BT - Interpreting Constitutions

PB - Oxford University Press, USA

ER -