International records management standards: the challenges of achieving consensus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify and explore the tensions inherent in the development of international standards for records management, focusing on the revision of ISO15489. The paper aims to raise awareness of the need for much more research into the uptake and implementation of records management standards.
Design/methodology/approach: The experiences of the ISO committee responsible for drafting ISO15489 provides the context in which to review the literature relating to standards development in information technology.
Findings: The development of mutual trust or social capital between ISO committee members responsible for the initial drafting of ISO15489 may have been instrumental in achieving a successful outcome which masked on-going fundamental differences. Environmental factors are quite different for the revision of ISO15489 suggesting that positive social capital may not be generated. The objective of ISO15489 to be an anticipatory or reactive standard needs to be resolved.
Originality/value: Drawing on experiences from a related domain provides a new perspective for those involved in drafting records management standards, and explains to the broader records community why standard setting is so challenging.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-31
Number of pages10
JournalRecords Management Journal
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • International standards
  • ISO 15489
  • Standards development process

Cite this

@article{214b8336734e48f99ef978c0d2f1c4a7,
title = "International records management standards: the challenges of achieving consensus",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify and explore the tensions inherent in the development of international standards for records management, focusing on the revision of ISO15489. The paper aims to raise awareness of the need for much more research into the uptake and implementation of records management standards. Design/methodology/approach: The experiences of the ISO committee responsible for drafting ISO15489 provides the context in which to review the literature relating to standards development in information technology. Findings: The development of mutual trust or social capital between ISO committee members responsible for the initial drafting of ISO15489 may have been instrumental in achieving a successful outcome which masked on-going fundamental differences. Environmental factors are quite different for the revision of ISO15489 suggesting that positive social capital may not be generated. The objective of ISO15489 to be an anticipatory or reactive standard needs to be resolved. Originality/value: Drawing on experiences from a related domain provides a new perspective for those involved in drafting records management standards, and explains to the broader records community why standard setting is so challenging.",
keywords = "International standards, ISO 15489, Standards development process",
author = "Gillian Oliver",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1108/RMJ-01-2014-0002",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "22--31",
journal = "Records Management Journal",
issn = "0956-5698",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "1",

}

International records management standards : the challenges of achieving consensus. / Oliver, Gillian.

In: Records Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2014, p. 22-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - International records management standards

T2 - the challenges of achieving consensus

AU - Oliver, Gillian

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify and explore the tensions inherent in the development of international standards for records management, focusing on the revision of ISO15489. The paper aims to raise awareness of the need for much more research into the uptake and implementation of records management standards. Design/methodology/approach: The experiences of the ISO committee responsible for drafting ISO15489 provides the context in which to review the literature relating to standards development in information technology. Findings: The development of mutual trust or social capital between ISO committee members responsible for the initial drafting of ISO15489 may have been instrumental in achieving a successful outcome which masked on-going fundamental differences. Environmental factors are quite different for the revision of ISO15489 suggesting that positive social capital may not be generated. The objective of ISO15489 to be an anticipatory or reactive standard needs to be resolved. Originality/value: Drawing on experiences from a related domain provides a new perspective for those involved in drafting records management standards, and explains to the broader records community why standard setting is so challenging.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify and explore the tensions inherent in the development of international standards for records management, focusing on the revision of ISO15489. The paper aims to raise awareness of the need for much more research into the uptake and implementation of records management standards. Design/methodology/approach: The experiences of the ISO committee responsible for drafting ISO15489 provides the context in which to review the literature relating to standards development in information technology. Findings: The development of mutual trust or social capital between ISO committee members responsible for the initial drafting of ISO15489 may have been instrumental in achieving a successful outcome which masked on-going fundamental differences. Environmental factors are quite different for the revision of ISO15489 suggesting that positive social capital may not be generated. The objective of ISO15489 to be an anticipatory or reactive standard needs to be resolved. Originality/value: Drawing on experiences from a related domain provides a new perspective for those involved in drafting records management standards, and explains to the broader records community why standard setting is so challenging.

KW - International standards

KW - ISO 15489

KW - Standards development process

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897938771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/RMJ-01-2014-0002

DO - 10.1108/RMJ-01-2014-0002

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 22

EP - 31

JO - Records Management Journal

JF - Records Management Journal

SN - 0956-5698

IS - 1

ER -