Integrating between-session interventions (homework) in therapy: the importance of the therapeutic relationship and cognitive case conceptualization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Between-session interventions, or homework, are crucial to a range of psychological therapies, including cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). Therapeutic interventions often involve experiencing emotions and situations, or examining strongly held views about their problems, that clients can find distressing. Hence, the clinician faces a particular challenge in collaborating with the client to carry out these interventions between sessions. In this article, we convey how this process in CBT requires not only a consideration of the theoretically meaningful determinants of adherence behavior but also a sophisticated cognitive case conceptualization. Using case material, we illustrate the interplay between in-session design, planning, and review of between-session interventions and the conceptualization. We also include a distinction between generic elements of the therapeutic relationship and CBT-specific elements. The case material also attends to the person of the therapist, and his or her own cognitive and emotional reactions occurring throughout the process of discussing between-session interventions
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)439 - 450
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Psychology
Volume71
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

@article{b5d555b71f7a40d6b6486764f4e51fea,
title = "Integrating between-session interventions (homework) in therapy: the importance of the therapeutic relationship and cognitive case conceptualization",
abstract = "Between-session interventions, or homework, are crucial to a range of psychological therapies, including cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). Therapeutic interventions often involve experiencing emotions and situations, or examining strongly held views about their problems, that clients can find distressing. Hence, the clinician faces a particular challenge in collaborating with the client to carry out these interventions between sessions. In this article, we convey how this process in CBT requires not only a consideration of the theoretically meaningful determinants of adherence behavior but also a sophisticated cognitive case conceptualization. Using case material, we illustrate the interplay between in-session design, planning, and review of between-session interventions and the conceptualization. We also include a distinction between generic elements of the therapeutic relationship and CBT-specific elements. The case material also attends to the person of the therapist, and his or her own cognitive and emotional reactions occurring throughout the process of discussing between-session interventions",
author = "Timothy Cronin and Katherine Lawrence and Taylor, {Kathryn Bliss} and Norton, {Peter Joseph} and Nikolaos Kazantzis",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1002/jclp.22180",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "439 -- 450",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Psychology",
issn = "0021-9762",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating between-session interventions (homework) in therapy: the importance of the therapeutic relationship and cognitive case conceptualization

AU - Cronin, Timothy

AU - Lawrence, Katherine

AU - Taylor, Kathryn Bliss

AU - Norton, Peter Joseph

AU - Kazantzis, Nikolaos

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Between-session interventions, or homework, are crucial to a range of psychological therapies, including cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). Therapeutic interventions often involve experiencing emotions and situations, or examining strongly held views about their problems, that clients can find distressing. Hence, the clinician faces a particular challenge in collaborating with the client to carry out these interventions between sessions. In this article, we convey how this process in CBT requires not only a consideration of the theoretically meaningful determinants of adherence behavior but also a sophisticated cognitive case conceptualization. Using case material, we illustrate the interplay between in-session design, planning, and review of between-session interventions and the conceptualization. We also include a distinction between generic elements of the therapeutic relationship and CBT-specific elements. The case material also attends to the person of the therapist, and his or her own cognitive and emotional reactions occurring throughout the process of discussing between-session interventions

AB - Between-session interventions, or homework, are crucial to a range of psychological therapies, including cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). Therapeutic interventions often involve experiencing emotions and situations, or examining strongly held views about their problems, that clients can find distressing. Hence, the clinician faces a particular challenge in collaborating with the client to carry out these interventions between sessions. In this article, we convey how this process in CBT requires not only a consideration of the theoretically meaningful determinants of adherence behavior but also a sophisticated cognitive case conceptualization. Using case material, we illustrate the interplay between in-session design, planning, and review of between-session interventions and the conceptualization. We also include a distinction between generic elements of the therapeutic relationship and CBT-specific elements. The case material also attends to the person of the therapist, and his or her own cognitive and emotional reactions occurring throughout the process of discussing between-session interventions

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.22180/epdf

U2 - 10.1002/jclp.22180

DO - 10.1002/jclp.22180

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 439

EP - 450

JO - Journal of Clinical Psychology

JF - Journal of Clinical Psychology

SN - 0021-9762

IS - 5

ER -