Insight from social media use by memory institutions in New Zealand: Participatory vs curatorial culture

Chern Li Liew, Gillian Oliver, Morgan Watkins

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose - The relatively under-documented "dark side" of participatory activities facilitated by memory institutions through social media is examined in this study. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the risks and perception of risks resulting from using social media for public engagement and participation. Design/methodology/approach - Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fourteen representatives from the New Zealand information and cultural heritage sector who at the time of the study were holding the main responsibilities of overseeing the social media and participatory activities of the institutions they represented. Findings - It is not evident that the growth of social web has significantly changed the way the heritage sector seeks participation. Only a small minority of the sample institutions appear to be using social web tools to build community and to enhance their heritage collections. For the majority, institutional use of social media is for creating a "chattering space". The main concerns identified by interviewees were reputation management and the risk management process followed by most institutions appeared to be reactive, responding to problems as and when they occurred, rather than proactive about risk identification and avoidance. Research limitations/implications - Findings are not generalisable as the sample size of thirteen institutions is relatively small and is limited to one national context. Originality/value - Findings provide insight into largely unexplored issues relating to the development of participatory cultures by memory institutions. The paper highlights a key area where further research is needed, namely to explore whether participatory heritage should primarily be about curated viewpoints or whether it should encompass capturing living dialogues, even when conversations are potentially offensive.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)93-106
    Number of pages14
    JournalOnline Information Review
    Volume42
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Keywords

    • Memory institutions
    • Participatory heritage
    • Risk management
    • Risk perception
    • Social web

    Cite this

    @article{6b8c520f8f7a45d29916538231efe401,
    title = "Insight from social media use by memory institutions in New Zealand: Participatory vs curatorial culture",
    abstract = "Purpose - The relatively under-documented {"}dark side{"} of participatory activities facilitated by memory institutions through social media is examined in this study. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the risks and perception of risks resulting from using social media for public engagement and participation. Design/methodology/approach - Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fourteen representatives from the New Zealand information and cultural heritage sector who at the time of the study were holding the main responsibilities of overseeing the social media and participatory activities of the institutions they represented. Findings - It is not evident that the growth of social web has significantly changed the way the heritage sector seeks participation. Only a small minority of the sample institutions appear to be using social web tools to build community and to enhance their heritage collections. For the majority, institutional use of social media is for creating a {"}chattering space{"}. The main concerns identified by interviewees were reputation management and the risk management process followed by most institutions appeared to be reactive, responding to problems as and when they occurred, rather than proactive about risk identification and avoidance. Research limitations/implications - Findings are not generalisable as the sample size of thirteen institutions is relatively small and is limited to one national context. Originality/value - Findings provide insight into largely unexplored issues relating to the development of participatory cultures by memory institutions. The paper highlights a key area where further research is needed, namely to explore whether participatory heritage should primarily be about curated viewpoints or whether it should encompass capturing living dialogues, even when conversations are potentially offensive.",
    keywords = "Memory institutions, Participatory heritage, Risk management, Risk perception, Social web",
    author = "Liew, {Chern Li} and Gillian Oliver and Morgan Watkins",
    year = "2018",
    doi = "10.1108/OIR-08-2016-0218",
    language = "English",
    volume = "42",
    pages = "93--106",
    journal = "Online Information Review",
    issn = "1468-4527",
    publisher = "Emerald",
    number = "1",

    }

    Insight from social media use by memory institutions in New Zealand : Participatory vs curatorial culture. / Liew, Chern Li; Oliver, Gillian; Watkins, Morgan.

    In: Online Information Review, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2018, p. 93-106.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Insight from social media use by memory institutions in New Zealand

    T2 - Participatory vs curatorial culture

    AU - Liew, Chern Li

    AU - Oliver, Gillian

    AU - Watkins, Morgan

    PY - 2018

    Y1 - 2018

    N2 - Purpose - The relatively under-documented "dark side" of participatory activities facilitated by memory institutions through social media is examined in this study. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the risks and perception of risks resulting from using social media for public engagement and participation. Design/methodology/approach - Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fourteen representatives from the New Zealand information and cultural heritage sector who at the time of the study were holding the main responsibilities of overseeing the social media and participatory activities of the institutions they represented. Findings - It is not evident that the growth of social web has significantly changed the way the heritage sector seeks participation. Only a small minority of the sample institutions appear to be using social web tools to build community and to enhance their heritage collections. For the majority, institutional use of social media is for creating a "chattering space". The main concerns identified by interviewees were reputation management and the risk management process followed by most institutions appeared to be reactive, responding to problems as and when they occurred, rather than proactive about risk identification and avoidance. Research limitations/implications - Findings are not generalisable as the sample size of thirteen institutions is relatively small and is limited to one national context. Originality/value - Findings provide insight into largely unexplored issues relating to the development of participatory cultures by memory institutions. The paper highlights a key area where further research is needed, namely to explore whether participatory heritage should primarily be about curated viewpoints or whether it should encompass capturing living dialogues, even when conversations are potentially offensive.

    AB - Purpose - The relatively under-documented "dark side" of participatory activities facilitated by memory institutions through social media is examined in this study. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the risks and perception of risks resulting from using social media for public engagement and participation. Design/methodology/approach - Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fourteen representatives from the New Zealand information and cultural heritage sector who at the time of the study were holding the main responsibilities of overseeing the social media and participatory activities of the institutions they represented. Findings - It is not evident that the growth of social web has significantly changed the way the heritage sector seeks participation. Only a small minority of the sample institutions appear to be using social web tools to build community and to enhance their heritage collections. For the majority, institutional use of social media is for creating a "chattering space". The main concerns identified by interviewees were reputation management and the risk management process followed by most institutions appeared to be reactive, responding to problems as and when they occurred, rather than proactive about risk identification and avoidance. Research limitations/implications - Findings are not generalisable as the sample size of thirteen institutions is relatively small and is limited to one national context. Originality/value - Findings provide insight into largely unexplored issues relating to the development of participatory cultures by memory institutions. The paper highlights a key area where further research is needed, namely to explore whether participatory heritage should primarily be about curated viewpoints or whether it should encompass capturing living dialogues, even when conversations are potentially offensive.

    KW - Memory institutions

    KW - Participatory heritage

    KW - Risk management

    KW - Risk perception

    KW - Social web

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040197802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1108/OIR-08-2016-0218

    DO - 10.1108/OIR-08-2016-0218

    M3 - Article

    VL - 42

    SP - 93

    EP - 106

    JO - Online Information Review

    JF - Online Information Review

    SN - 1468-4527

    IS - 1

    ER -