Inoculation theory in the post-truth era: Extant findings and new frontiers for contested science, misinformation, and conspiracy theories

Joshua Compton, Sander van der Linden, John Cook, Melisa Basol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although there has been unprecedented attention to inoculation theory in recent years, the potential of this research has yet to be reached. Inoculation theory explains how immunity to counter-attitudinal messages is conferred by preemptively exposing people to weakened doses of challenging information. The theory has been applied in a number of contexts (e.g., politics, health) in its 50+ year history. Importantly, one of the newest contexts for inoculation theory is work in the area of contested science, misinformation, and conspiracy theories. Recent research has revealed that when a desirable position on a scientific issue (e.g., climate change) exists, conventional preemptive (prophylactic) inoculation can help to protect it from misinformation, and that even when people have undesirable positions, “therapeutic” inoculation messages can have positive effects. We call for further research to explain and predict the efficacy of inoculation theory in this new context to help inform better public understandings of issues such as climate change, genetically modified organisms, vaccine hesitancy, and other contested science beliefs such as conspiracy theories about COVID-19.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages16
JournalSocial and Personality Psychology Compass
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • inoculation theory
  • misinformation
  • conspiracy theories
  • post-truth

Cite this