TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of serum iron test results on the diagnosis of iron deficiency in children
T2 - A retrospective observational study
AU - Sezgin, Gorkem
AU - Li, Ling
AU - Westbrook, Johanna
AU - Wearne, Elisabeth
AU - Azar, Denise
AU - McLeod, Adam
AU - Pearce, Christopher
AU - Ignjatovic, Vera
AU - Monagle, Paul
AU - Georgiou, A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This study was supported by funding from the Quality Use of Pathology Program, Department of Health, Government of Australia (4-2QFVW4M).
Publisher Copyright:
©
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Background and objective Serum iron results are not indicative of iron deficiency yet may be incorrectly used to diagnose iron deficiency instead of serum ferritin results. Our objective was to determine the association between serum iron test results and iron-deficiency diagnosis in children by general practitioners. Design, setting, patients and main outcome measures A retrospective observational study of 14 187 children aged 1-18 years with serum ferritin and serum iron test results from 137 general practices in Victoria, Australia, between 2008 and 2018. Generalised estimating equation models calculating ORs were used to determine the association between serum iron test results (main exposure measure) and iron-deficiency diagnosis (outcome measure) in the following two population groups: (1) iron-deplete population, defined as having a serum ferritin <12 μg/L if aged <5 years and <15 μg/L if aged ≥5 years and (2) iron-replete population, defined as having a serum ferritin >30 μg/L. Results 3484 tests were iron deplete and 15 528 were iron replete. Iron-deplete children were less likely to be diagnosed with iron deficiency if they had normal serum iron levels (adjusted OR (AOR): 0.73; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.96). Iron-replete children had greater odds of an iron-deficiency diagnosis if they had low serum iron results (AOR: 2.59; 95% CI 1.72 to 3.89). Other contributors to an iron-deficiency diagnosis were female sex and having anaemia. Conclusion Serum ferritin alone remains the best means of diagnosing iron deficiency. Reliance on serum iron test results by general practitioners is leading to significant overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis of iron deficiency in children.
AB - Background and objective Serum iron results are not indicative of iron deficiency yet may be incorrectly used to diagnose iron deficiency instead of serum ferritin results. Our objective was to determine the association between serum iron test results and iron-deficiency diagnosis in children by general practitioners. Design, setting, patients and main outcome measures A retrospective observational study of 14 187 children aged 1-18 years with serum ferritin and serum iron test results from 137 general practices in Victoria, Australia, between 2008 and 2018. Generalised estimating equation models calculating ORs were used to determine the association between serum iron test results (main exposure measure) and iron-deficiency diagnosis (outcome measure) in the following two population groups: (1) iron-deplete population, defined as having a serum ferritin <12 μg/L if aged <5 years and <15 μg/L if aged ≥5 years and (2) iron-replete population, defined as having a serum ferritin >30 μg/L. Results 3484 tests were iron deplete and 15 528 were iron replete. Iron-deplete children were less likely to be diagnosed with iron deficiency if they had normal serum iron levels (adjusted OR (AOR): 0.73; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.96). Iron-replete children had greater odds of an iron-deficiency diagnosis if they had low serum iron results (AOR: 2.59; 95% CI 1.72 to 3.89). Other contributors to an iron-deficiency diagnosis were female sex and having anaemia. Conclusion Serum ferritin alone remains the best means of diagnosing iron deficiency. Reliance on serum iron test results by general practitioners is leading to significant overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis of iron deficiency in children.
KW - anaemia
KW - chemical pathology
KW - clinical chemistry
KW - paediatric pathology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110862231&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046865
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046865
M3 - Article
C2 - 34226221
AN - SCOPUS:85110862231
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 11
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 7
M1 - 046865
ER -