Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic performance of CT angiography derived FFR in coronary artery disease: a substudy of the NXT trial

Bjarne L Norgaard, Sara Gaur, Jonathon Leipsic, Hiroshi Ito, Toru Miyoshi, Seung-Jung Park, Ligita Zvaigzne, Nikolaos Tzemos, Jesper M Jensen, Nicolaj Hansson, Brian Ko, Hiram Bezerra, Evald H Christiansen, Anne Kaltoft, Jens F Lassen, Hans Erik Botker, Stephan Achenbach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to examine the diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) (FFRCT) in relation to coronary calcification severity. BACKGROUND: FFRCT has shown promising results in identifying lesion-specific ischemia. The extent to which the severity of coronary calcification affects the diagnostic performance of FFRCT is not known. METHODS: Coronary calcification was assessed by using the Agatston score (AS) in 214 patients suspected of having coronary artery disease who underwent coronary CTA, FFRCT, and FFR (FFR examination was performed in 333 vessels). The diagnostic performance of FFRCT (50 . RESULTS: Mean +/- SD per-patient and per-vessel AS were 302 +/- 468 (range 0 to 3,599) and 95 +/- 172 (range 0 to 1,703), respectively. There was no statistical difference in diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity of FFRCT across AS quartiles. Discrimination of ischemia by FFRCT was high in patients with a high AS (416 to 3,599) and a low-mid AS (0 to 415), with no difference in area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.86 [95 confidence interval (CI): 0.76 to 0.96] vs. 0.92 [95 CI: 0.88 to 0.96]) (p = 0.45). Similarly, discrimination of ischemia by FFRCT was high in vessels with a high AS (121 to 1,703) and a low-mid AS (0 to 120) (AUC: 0.91 [95 CI: 0.85 to 0.97] vs. 0.95 [95 CI: 0.91 to 0.98]; p = 0.65). Diagnostic accuracy and specificity of FFRCT were significantly higher than for stenosis assessment in each AS quartile at the per-patient (p <0.001) and per-vessel (p <0.05) level with similar sensitivity. In vessels with a high AS, FFRCT exhibited improved discrimination of ischemia compared with coronary CTA alone (AUC: 0.91 vs. 0.71; p = 0.004), whereas on a per-patient level, the difference did not reach statistical significance (AUC: 0.86 vs. 0.72; p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: FFRCT provided high and superior diagnostic performance compared with coronary CTA interpretation alone in patients and vessels with a high AS.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1045 - 1055
Number of pages11
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Volume8
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this