Individual separateness or universal scheme? - A note on neo-darwinian vs. non-darwinian evolutionary social science

Elias L. Khalil

doi:10.1007/BF02734138

Individual separateness or universal scheme? - A note on neo-darwinian vs. non-darwinian evolutionary social science

Elias L. Khalil

Department of Economics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	91-94
Number of pages	4
Journal	Human Nature
Volume	6
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734138
Publication status	Published - Mar 1995

Keywords

Essentialism
Evolutionary anthropology
Evolutionary psychology
Population thinking

Access to Document

10.1007/BF02734138

Cite this

@article{71290be5738546d7a03995870fec98d4,

title = "Individual separateness or universal scheme? - A note on neo-darwinian vs. non-darwinian evolutionary social science",

keywords = "Essentialism, Evolutionary anthropology, Evolutionary psychology, Population thinking",

author = "Khalil, {Elias L.}",

year = "1995",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1007/BF02734138",

language = "English",

volume = "6",

pages = "91--94",

journal = "Human Nature",

issn = "1045-6767",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual separateness or universal scheme? - A note on neo-darwinian vs. non-darwinian evolutionary social science

AU - Khalil, Elias L.

PY - 1995/3

Y1 - 1995/3

KW - Essentialism

KW - Evolutionary anthropology

KW - Evolutionary psychology

KW - Population thinking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51649137727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02734138

DO - 10.1007/BF02734138

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:51649137727

VL - 6

SP - 91

EP - 94

JO - Human Nature

JF - Human Nature

SN - 1045-6767

IS - 1

ER -

Individual separateness or universal scheme? - A note on neo-darwinian vs. non-darwinian evolutionary social science

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this