TY - JOUR
T1 - Incentivising interdisciplinary research collaboration
T2 - evidence from Australia
AU - Newman, Joshua
N1 - Funding Information:
I don’t think we should just throw money at it. If I hear another person talk to me about, ‘Create a big pot of money, and people can bid for that money, and that will encourage them to do it’. I don’t think you should give a single grant out for interdisciplinary work funded by the university, unless it’s got a sustainability plan beyond the university’s money.
Funding Information:
From one point of view, the findings of this study align with the notion of the neoliberal university, in which relationships between workers and managers (as well as those between teachers and students) are highly transactional (Ball, ; Canaan & Shumar, ; Szekeres, ). In such a corporatised institutional environment, it would not be surprising that workers would ask for greater material benefits and that managers, seeking to cut costs, might be reluctant to offer these benefits. It could be that if this study had asked about PhD student recruitment, or support for participation in academic conferences, or research impact, or any number of other concerns of academic university staff, the results might have been the same. On the other hand, university leaders do think that some things are worth materially incentivising, such as research projects funded by internal grant schemes, or publications rewarded through highly metricised performance regimes, among other programs. It could be that university leaders are in favour of material incentives for some activities, say, research publications, but not for others – such as interdisciplinary collaboration. Further research would be required to disentangle these issues.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - There is a popular perception that interdisciplinary research collaboration can yield benefits to knowledge production, from improvements to creativity to advances in addressing real-world problems. However, studies into interdisciplinarity frequently point to material obstacles, such as burdensome time and resource requirements, difficulties in publishing, and scarce opportunities for grant funding, which imply that incentives or rewards might be required to motivate academics to collaborate with colleagues across research disciplines. This article reports the results of a survey of academics and interviews with senior university leaders at a large research-intensive university in Australia, which indicate a major difference of opinion on how to incentivise interdisciplinary collaboration. While survey respondents largely emphasised material concerns, university leaders cited cultural change as a preferred strategy. If interdisciplinary research collaboration is desired, this gap between the perceptions of academics, who do the research, and university leaders, who control the resources, will need to be bridged.
AB - There is a popular perception that interdisciplinary research collaboration can yield benefits to knowledge production, from improvements to creativity to advances in addressing real-world problems. However, studies into interdisciplinarity frequently point to material obstacles, such as burdensome time and resource requirements, difficulties in publishing, and scarce opportunities for grant funding, which imply that incentives or rewards might be required to motivate academics to collaborate with colleagues across research disciplines. This article reports the results of a survey of academics and interviews with senior university leaders at a large research-intensive university in Australia, which indicate a major difference of opinion on how to incentivise interdisciplinary collaboration. While survey respondents largely emphasised material concerns, university leaders cited cultural change as a preferred strategy. If interdisciplinary research collaboration is desired, this gap between the perceptions of academics, who do the research, and university leaders, who control the resources, will need to be bridged.
KW - Australia
KW - cross-disciplinary research
KW - interdisciplinarity
KW - interdisciplinary research collaboration
KW - multidisciplinary research
KW - transdisciplinary research
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85173788259
U2 - 10.1080/1360080X.2023.2267719
DO - 10.1080/1360080X.2023.2267719
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85173788259
SN - 1360-080X
VL - 46
SP - 146
EP - 165
JO - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
JF - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
IS - 2
ER -