TY - JOUR
T1 - In vitro Evaluation of Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel as an Anti-biofilm Agent Against Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Infections
AU - Qu, Yue
AU - McGiffin, David
AU - Kure, Christina
AU - McLean, Janelle
AU - Duncan, Courtney
AU - Peleg, Anton Y.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Alfred Foundation and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC; APP1079421 and APP1117940) CRE ACTIONS. AP also acknowledges support from an Australian NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship. The contents of the published material are solely the responsibility of individual authors and do not reflect the views of NHMRC.
Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2020 Qu, McGiffin, Kure, McLean, Duncan and Peleg.
PY - 2020/11/23
Y1 - 2020/11/23
N2 - Objectives: In adult ventricular assist device (VAD) programs in Australian hospitals, Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel (MAWG) is routinely used at the skin exit-site of VAD drivelines to prevent infections; however, its effectiveness remains unclear. Our aim was to assess antimicrobial activity of Medihoney wound gel, using in vitro models that mimic clinical biofilms grown at the driveline exit-site. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of MAWG was performed for 24 clinical isolates grown under planktonic conditions, and four representative strains grown as biofilms. Different antimicrobial mechanisms of MAWG were assessed respectively for their relative contribution to its anti-biofilm activity. A colony biofilm assay and a drip-flow biofilm reactor assay mimicking the driveline exit-site environment were used to evaluate the activity of MAWG against biofilm growth at the driveline exit-site. Results: MAWG demonstrated species-specific activity against planktonic cultures [minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), 5–20% weight/volume (W/V) for Staphylococcus species, 20–>40% (W/V) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida species]. Higher concentrations [MICs, 30–>80% (W/V)] were able to inhibit biofilm growth, but failed to eradicate pre-established biofilms. The anti-biofilm properties of MAWG were multi-faceted, with the often-advertised “active” ingredient methylglyoxal (MGO) playing a less important role. The colony biofilm assay and the drip-flow biofilm reactor assay suggested that MAWG was unable to kill biofilms pre-established in a driveline exit-site environment, or effectively prevent planktonic cells from forming adherent monolayers and further developing mature biofilms. Conclusion: Our work suggests a suboptimal effectiveness of MAWG in preventing driveline infections due to biofilm development.
AB - Objectives: In adult ventricular assist device (VAD) programs in Australian hospitals, Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel (MAWG) is routinely used at the skin exit-site of VAD drivelines to prevent infections; however, its effectiveness remains unclear. Our aim was to assess antimicrobial activity of Medihoney wound gel, using in vitro models that mimic clinical biofilms grown at the driveline exit-site. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of MAWG was performed for 24 clinical isolates grown under planktonic conditions, and four representative strains grown as biofilms. Different antimicrobial mechanisms of MAWG were assessed respectively for their relative contribution to its anti-biofilm activity. A colony biofilm assay and a drip-flow biofilm reactor assay mimicking the driveline exit-site environment were used to evaluate the activity of MAWG against biofilm growth at the driveline exit-site. Results: MAWG demonstrated species-specific activity against planktonic cultures [minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), 5–20% weight/volume (W/V) for Staphylococcus species, 20–>40% (W/V) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida species]. Higher concentrations [MICs, 30–>80% (W/V)] were able to inhibit biofilm growth, but failed to eradicate pre-established biofilms. The anti-biofilm properties of MAWG were multi-faceted, with the often-advertised “active” ingredient methylglyoxal (MGO) playing a less important role. The colony biofilm assay and the drip-flow biofilm reactor assay suggested that MAWG was unable to kill biofilms pre-established in a driveline exit-site environment, or effectively prevent planktonic cells from forming adherent monolayers and further developing mature biofilms. Conclusion: Our work suggests a suboptimal effectiveness of MAWG in preventing driveline infections due to biofilm development.
KW - anti-biofilm
KW - driveline infections
KW - Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel
KW - methylglyoxal
KW - ventricular assistant device
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097258272&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fmicb.2020.605608
DO - 10.3389/fmicb.2020.605608
M3 - Article
C2 - 33329497
AN - SCOPUS:85097258272
SN - 1664-302X
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in Microbiology
JF - Frontiers in Microbiology
M1 - 605608
ER -